Department of Economics, University of La Rioja, La Cigüeña 60, 26004, Logroño, Spain.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2024 Jun;24(2):155-172. doi: 10.1007/s10754-024-09367-2. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
This paper focuses on the economics of vaccination and, more specifically, analyzes the vaccination decision of individuals using a game-theoretic model combined with an epidemiological SIR model that reproduces the infection dynamics of a generic disease. We characterize the equilibrium individual vaccination rate, and we show that it is below the rate compatible with herd immunity due to the existence of externalities that individuals do not internalize when they decide on vaccination. In addition, we analyze three public policies consisting of informational campaigns to reduce the disutility of vaccination, monetary payments to vaccinated individuals and measures to increase the disutility of non-vaccination. If the public authority uses only one type of policy, herd immunity is not necessarily achieved unless monetary incentives are used. When the public authority is not limited to use only one policy, we find that the optimal public policy should consist only of informational campaigns if they are sufficiently effective, or a combination of informational campaigns and monetary incentives otherwise. Surprisingly, the requirement of vaccine passports or other restrictions on the non-vaccinated are not desirable.
本文聚焦于疫苗接种经济学,更具体地说,使用博弈论模型结合再现一般疾病感染动态的流行病学 SIR 模型来分析个体的疫苗接种决策。我们刻画了均衡的个体疫苗接种率,并表明,由于个体在决定接种疫苗时没有内化外部性,因此该接种率低于群体免疫相容率。此外,我们分析了三种公共政策,包括减少疫苗接种负效用的信息宣传活动、对已接种个体的货币支付以及增加未接种疫苗负效用的措施。如果公共当局只使用一种类型的政策,除非使用货币激励措施,否则不一定能实现群体免疫。当公共当局不限于只使用一种政策时,我们发现,如果信息宣传活动足够有效,那么最优公共政策应该只包括信息宣传活动,否则应该是信息宣传活动和货币激励措施的结合。令人惊讶的是,疫苗护照或对未接种疫苗者的其他限制并不是可取的。