• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消风散治疗慢性荨麻疹的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of Xiaofeng powder in the treatment of chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

College of Acupuncture and Massage, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 22;103(12):e37305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037305.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000037305
PMID:38518009
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10956973/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria is a group of skin diseases characterized by pruritus and/or vascular oedema and belongs to the category of "addictive rash" in Traditional Chinese Medicine, and its aetiology is closely related to wind evil. Antihistamines are often used in treatment. Although they have certain effects, they also easily cause disease recurrence. Xiaofeng powder treats this disease has a significant effect in improving the disease state and reducing the recurrence rate. However, there is a lack of evidencebased research. This study to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of modified Xiaofeng powder in the treatment of chronic urticaria (CU).

METHODS

Computer searches of Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Scientific Journal Database, China Biomedical Literature Database, and WanFang Date and foreign databases such as PubMed and the Web of Science were performed. We retrieved published clinical randomized controlled trials of Xiaofeng powder in the treatment of CU from the establishment of the databases to November 2023. The data were extracted from clinical trials that met the inclusion criteria of this study, and the quality was evaluated through the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews 5.1.0. Finally, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 statistical software.

RESULTS

A total of 11 randomized controlled trials involving 1076 patients were included. The cure rate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI; shown in brackets) were 2.11 [1.45, 3.07]; the total effective rate OR and CI were 2.42 [1.60, 3.68]; the recurrence rate OR and CI were 0.22 [0.15, 0.34]; the adverse reaction rate OR and CI were 0.23 [0.12, 0.45]; and the mean weighted mean difference (MD) and 95% CI (shown in brackets) of itching degree, wind mass size, wind mass number and wind mass duration in symptom and sign integrals were -0.70 [-0.73, 0.67], -0.64 [-0.96, 0.31], , -0.72 [-1.23, 0.22], and -0.68 [-1.13, 0.23], , respectively.

CONCLUSION

The clinical efficacy of modified Xiaofeng powder in the treatment of CU is better than that of antihistamine drugs, with lower adverse reaction and recurrence rates and higher safety. However, the quality of clinical research included is relatively low, and findings need to be confirmed by high-quality research.

摘要

背景

慢性荨麻疹是一组以瘙痒和/或血管性水肿为特征的皮肤病,属于中医“瘾疹”范畴,其病因与风邪密切相关。治疗常使用抗组胺药。虽然它们有一定的效果,但也容易导致疾病复发。消风散治疗本病在改善病情和降低复发率方面有显著效果。然而,缺乏循证医学研究。本研究旨在系统评价消风散加减治疗慢性荨麻疹(CU)的临床疗效。

方法

计算机检索中国知网、中国科技期刊数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据等中文数据库,以及 PubMed 和 Web of Science 等外文数据库,检索建库至 2023 年 11 月发表的消风散治疗 CU 的临床随机对照试验。从符合纳入标准的临床试验中提取数据,并通过 Cochrane 系统评价手册 5.1.0 评价质量。最后,使用 RevMan 5.3 统计软件进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入 11 项随机对照试验,涉及 1076 例患者。治愈率优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI;括号内显示)为 2.11[1.45,3.07];总有效率 OR 和 CI 为 2.42[1.60,3.68];复发率 OR 和 CI 为 0.22[0.15,0.34];不良反应率 OR 和 CI 为 0.23[0.12,0.45];症状和体征积分瘙痒程度、风团大小、风团个数和风团持续时间的均数差值(MD)及 95%CI(括号内显示)分别为-0.70[-0.73,0.67]、-0.64[-0.96,0.31]、、-0.72[-1.23,0.22]和-0.68[-1.13,0.23]、、。

结论

消风散加减治疗 CU 的临床疗效优于抗组胺药,不良反应和复发率较低,安全性较高。但是,纳入的临床研究质量相对较低,需要高质量的研究来证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/ea2a3ebeaa3e/medi-103-e37305-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/ecb1627b3e6c/medi-103-e37305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/a444d4f53c7c/medi-103-e37305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/4e691ca3869d/medi-103-e37305-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/25be3529936d/medi-103-e37305-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/41d77d417759/medi-103-e37305-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/a24d279cf1ed/medi-103-e37305-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/34b06ddca35d/medi-103-e37305-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/099a11d6a95f/medi-103-e37305-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/5722766e0fd1/medi-103-e37305-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/ea2a3ebeaa3e/medi-103-e37305-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/ecb1627b3e6c/medi-103-e37305-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/a444d4f53c7c/medi-103-e37305-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/4e691ca3869d/medi-103-e37305-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/25be3529936d/medi-103-e37305-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/41d77d417759/medi-103-e37305-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/a24d279cf1ed/medi-103-e37305-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/34b06ddca35d/medi-103-e37305-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/099a11d6a95f/medi-103-e37305-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/5722766e0fd1/medi-103-e37305-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ae/10956973/ea2a3ebeaa3e/medi-103-e37305-g010.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of Xiaofeng powder in the treatment of chronic urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.消风散治疗慢性荨麻疹的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Mar 22;103(12):e37305. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037305.
2
Efficacy and safety of Xiaofeng powder (xiao feng san) in treating urticaria: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.消风散治疗荨麻疹的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13039. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013039.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Efficacy and safety of Zhishixiaopi decoction in functional dyspepsia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.益智消痞汤治疗功能性消化不良的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0301686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301686. eCollection 2024.
5
Efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for the treatment of epilepsy by wind quenching and phlegm resolving: A systematic review and meta-analysis.中药祛风化痰治疗癫痫的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e39942. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039942.
6
Efficacy and safety of Shenling Atractylodes Powder in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.参灵白术散治疗溃疡性结肠炎的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Apr 9;100(14):e25355. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025355.
7
Comparison of effectiveness and safety between granules and decoction of Chinese herbal medicine: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.中药颗粒剂与汤剂的有效性和安全性比较:一项随机临床试验的系统评价。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2012 Apr 10;140(3):555-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2012.01.031. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
8
The clinical effectiveness and safety of traditional Chinese medicine uremic clearance granule combined with high-flux hemodialysis in the treatment of uremic pruritus: A protocol for systematic review and meta analysis.中药尿毒清颗粒联合高通量血液透析治疗尿毒症瘙痒的临床有效性和安全性:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jun 25;100(25):e26423. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026423.
9
[Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of integrative medicine therapy for treatment of chronic severe hepatitis].[中西医结合疗法治疗慢性重型肝炎的随机对照试验的系统评价与Meta分析]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2012 Nov;10(11):1211-28. doi: 10.3736/jcim20121104.
10
Effectiveness of moxibustion therapy in the treatment of urticaria: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.艾灸疗法治疗荨麻疹的有效性:一项系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 4;99(49):e23481. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023481.