Jäger Peter, Hirt Julian, Nordhausen Thomas, Vetsch Janine, Balzer Katrin, Dichter Martin N, Müller Gerhard, Schley Angelika, Neyer Stefanie
Fachbereich Soziales und Gesundheit, Fachhochschule Vorarlberg, Dornbirn, Österreich.
Institut für Angewandte Pflegewissenschaft, OST Ostschweizer Fachhochschule, St. Gallen, Schweiz; Departement Klinische Forschung, Universitätsspital Basel und Universität Basel, Basel, Schweiz.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 May;186:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
BACKGROUND/AIM: Evidence-based practice (EBP) provides an important basis for improving both the quality of care and patient safety. Formulating a research question, searching the literature, and critical appraisal are crucial to developing evidence-based practice. The aim of this survey was to provide an overview of how these topics are integrated into bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany, and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. We also aimed to show how teachers implement these subjects and how they experience and assess the implementation.
We conducted an exploratory cross-sectional study using an online survey sent out to program directors and teaching staff of all 58 bachelor's degree programs in nursing in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland. For data collection, a questionnaire was developed containing items on general teaching conditions, contents, and methods of evidence-based nursing practice, as well as on the estimated thematic interest of students. The data were analysed descriptively.
The program directors returned 24 questionnaires (41%). Of 75 questionnaires forwarded to the faculty, 17 (23%) were received from nine programs. On average, 5.6 teaching units (SD 2.6) are used for formulating a research question, 10 teaching units (SD 4.1) for literature review, and 11.3 teaching units (SD 6.9) for critical appraisal. Half of the teaching staff indicated that linkages between education and nursing care practice have been established. The traditional teaching method of frontal teaching is used predominantly. Student interest in topics was rated as moderate by most teachers.
Topics on evidence-based practice are an integral part of bachelor's degree programs in nursing in German-speaking countries. An increase in teaching units, active learning methods and the growing interconnection between education and practice could improve the acquisition of competencies and attitudes of students regarding EBP and further advance its implementation in practice.
背景/目的:循证实践(EBP)为提高护理质量和患者安全提供了重要依据。提出研究问题、检索文献和批判性评价对于开展循证实践至关重要。本调查旨在概述这些主题如何融入奥地利、德国以及瑞士德语区的护理学学士学位课程。我们还旨在展示教师如何实施这些主题,以及他们对实施情况的体验和评估。
我们开展了一项探索性横断面研究,通过在线调查向奥地利、德国以及瑞士德语区所有58个护理学学士学位课程的项目主任和教学人员发送问卷。为收集数据,设计了一份问卷,内容包括一般教学条件、循证护理实践的内容和方法,以及学生对各主题的预估兴趣。对数据进行描述性分析。
项目主任返回了24份问卷(41%)。在转发给教师的75份问卷中,收到了来自9个课程的17份(23%)。平均而言,5.6个教学单元(标准差2.6)用于提出研究问题,10个教学单元(标准差4.1)用于文献综述,11.3个教学单元(标准差6.9)用于批判性评价。一半的教学人员表示已建立教育与护理实践之间的联系。主要采用传统的正面教学方法。大多数教师认为学生对这些主题的兴趣为中等。
循证实践主题是德语国家护理学学士学位课程的一个组成部分。增加教学单元、采用主动学习方法以及加强教育与实践之间日益紧密的联系,可提高学生在循证实践方面的能力和态度,并进一步推动其在实践中的实施。