Willie Tiara C, Sharpless Laurel, Katague Marina, Kershaw Trace
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2025 Jan-Feb;140(1_suppl):40S-49S. doi: 10.1177/00333549241238895. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
During times of crises, women are at elevated risk for intimate partner violence (IPV), but extant discourse fails to consider how this landscape amplifies disparities for Black women. This study examined the prevalence and associations of COVID-19 pandemic-specific coercive control and COVID-19-related stress among Black women experiencing IPV.
Fifty-five Black women reporting past-year IPV participated in a prospective cohort study in 2020 and completed surveys on pandemic-specific coercive control, COVID-19-related stress, and sociodemographic characteristics. A subset of 15 participants completed semi-structured interviews in 2021. We conducted multivariable regression analyses to examine associations between coercive control and stress. We used interpretive phenomenological analysis to contextualize women's experiences of coercive control and stress during the pandemic.
In the past 3 months, 76% (42 of 55) of women had a partner blame them for exposing them to COVID-19, 74% (41 of 55) had a partner minimize their pandemic concerns, and 52% (29 of 55) had a partner prevent them from getting a COVID-19 test. A higher average of pandemic-specific coercive control was associated with greater severity of COVID-19-related traumatic stress (b [SE] = 0.033 [0.009]; = .001) and socioeconomic consequences related to COVID-19 (b [SE] = 0.019 [0.008]; = .03). We identified 3 superordinate themes that illustrated Black women's experiences: (1) coercive control, (2) pandemic-driven shifts in relational context, and (3) women's structural and psychosocial stressors.
Experiencing coercive control during the pandemic interfered with Black women's engagement in preventive behaviors, which exacerbated distress. Intersectional public health efforts should address sociostructural and relational factors to prevent coercive control and stress among Black women experiencing IPV.
在危机时期,女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的风险会升高,但现有论述未能考虑这种情况如何加剧黑人女性所面临的差异。本研究调查了遭受IPV的黑人女性中特定于新冠疫情的强制性控制行为的流行情况及其与新冠疫情相关压力之间的关联。
55名报告过去一年遭受IPV的黑人女性参与了2020年的一项前瞻性队列研究,并完成了关于特定于疫情的强制性控制行为、与新冠疫情相关的压力以及社会人口学特征的调查。2021年,15名参与者的子样本完成了半结构化访谈。我们进行了多变量回归分析,以研究强制性控制行为与压力之间的关联。我们使用解释性现象学分析来阐释女性在疫情期间遭受强制性控制行为和压力的经历。
在过去3个月中,76%(55名中的42名)的女性遭受伴侣指责她们使伴侣暴露于新冠病毒;74%(55名中的41名)的女性遭受伴侣轻视她们对疫情的担忧;52%(55名中的29名)的女性遭受伴侣阻止她们进行新冠病毒检测。特定于疫情的强制性控制行为的平均水平越高,与新冠疫情相关的创伤性压力的严重程度越高(b [标准误] = 0.033 [0.009];P = 0.001),且与新冠疫情相关的社会经济后果越严重(b [标准误] = 0.019 [0.008];P = 0.03)。我们确定了3个上级主题,阐释了黑人女性的经历:(1)强制性控制行为,(2)疫情导致的关系背景变化,(3)女性的结构性和心理社会压力源。
在疫情期间遭受强制性控制行为妨碍了黑人女性采取预防行为,这加剧了她们的痛苦。跨领域的公共卫生努力应解决社会结构和关系因素,以预防遭受IPV的黑人女性遭受强制性控制行为和压力。