Wake Forest University School of Law, 1834 Wake Forest Road, Winston Salem, NC, 27109, USA.
Yale School of Nursing, New Haven, CT, USA.
J Urban Health. 2021 Feb;98(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00502-1. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
The COVID-19 pandemic precipitated catastrophic job loss, unprecedented unemployment rates, and severe economic hardship in renter households. As a result, housing precarity and the risk of eviction increased and worsened during the pandemic, especially among people of color and low-income populations. This paper considers the implications of this eviction crisis for health and health inequity, and the need for eviction prevention policies during the pandemic. Eviction and housing displacement are particularly threatening to individual and public health during a pandemic. Eviction is likely to increase COVID-19 infection rates because it results in overcrowded living environments, doubling up, transiency, limited access to healthcare, and a decreased ability to comply with pandemic mitigation strategies (e.g., social distancing, self-quarantine, and hygiene practices). Indeed, recent studies suggest that eviction may increase the spread of COVID-19 and that the absence or lifting of eviction moratoria may be associated with an increased rate of COVID-19 infection and death. Eviction is also a driver of health inequity as historic trends, and recent data demonstrate that people of color are more likely to face eviction and associated comorbidities. Black people have had less confidence in their ability to pay rent and are dying at 2.1 times the rate of non-Hispanic Whites. Indigenous Americans and Hispanic/Latinx people face an infection rate almost 3 times the rate of non-Hispanic whites. Disproportionate rates of both COVID-19 and eviction in communities of color compound negative health effects make eviction prevention a critical intervention to address racial health inequity. In light of the undisputed connection between eviction and health outcomes, eviction prevention, through moratoria and other supportive measures, is a key component of pandemic control strategies to mitigate COVID-19 spread and death.
新冠疫情导致灾难性的失业、前所未有的失业率以及租房家庭的严重经济困难。因此,在疫情期间,住房不稳定和被驱逐的风险增加并恶化,尤其是在有色人种和低收入人群中。本文考虑了这场驱逐危机对健康和健康不平等的影响,以及在疫情期间需要制定防止驱逐的政策。在大流行期间,驱逐和住房流离失所对个人和公共健康尤其具有威胁性。驱逐很可能会增加 COVID-19 的感染率,因为它会导致居住环境过度拥挤、合住、流动性增加、获得医疗保健的机会有限以及遵守大流行缓解策略(例如保持社交距离、自我隔离和卫生习惯)的能力下降。事实上,最近的研究表明,驱逐可能会增加 COVID-19 的传播,而且驱逐禁令的缺席或解除可能与 COVID-19 感染率和死亡率的增加有关。驱逐也是健康不平等的一个驱动因素,因为历史趋势和最近的数据表明,有色人种更有可能面临驱逐和相关的合并症。黑人支付租金的信心较低,死亡率是非西班牙裔白人的 2.1 倍。美国原住民和西班牙裔/拉丁裔人的感染率几乎是非西班牙裔白人的 3 倍。有色人种社区中 COVID-19 和驱逐的不成比例比率加剧了负面健康影响,因此,防止驱逐是解决种族健康不平等问题的关键干预措施。鉴于驱逐与健康结果之间的无可争议的联系,通过禁令和其他支持措施来防止驱逐是控制大流行策略的一个关键组成部分,以减轻 COVID-19 的传播和死亡。