College of Dentistry, University of Saskatchewan, 105 Wiggins Road, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5E5, Canada.
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04096-x.
Understanding the distinct proteomics profiles in dogs' oral biofluids enhances diagnostic and therapeutic insights for canine oral diseases, fostering cross-species translational research in dentistry and medicine. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to investigate the similarities and differences between the oral biofluids' proteomics profile of dogs with and without oral diseases.
PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched with no restrictions on publication language or year to address the following focused question: "What is the proteome signature of healthy versus diseased (oral) dogs' biofluids?" Gene Ontology enrichment and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses of the most abundant proteins were performed. Moreover, protein-protein interaction analysis was conducted. The risk of bias (RoB) among the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data.
In healthy dogs, the proteomic analysis identified 5,451 proteins, with 137 being the most abundant, predominantly associated with 'innate immune response'. Dogs with oral diseases displayed 6,470 proteins, with distinct associations: 'defense response to bacterium' (periodontal diseases), 'negative regulation of transcription' (dental calculus), and 'positive regulation of transcription' (oral tumors). Clustering revealed significant protein clusters in each case, emphasizing the diverse molecular profiles in health and oral diseases. Only six studies were provided to the JBI tool, as they encompassed case-control evaluations that compared healthy dogs to dogs with oral disease(s). All included studies were found to have low RoB (high quality).
Significant differences in the proteomics profiles of oral biofluids between dogs with and without oral diseases were found. The synergy of animal proteomics and bioinformatics offers a promising avenue for cross-species research, despite persistent challenges in result validation.
了解犬口腔生物体液中独特的蛋白质组学特征,可增强对犬口腔疾病的诊断和治疗见解,促进口腔医学和医学领域的跨物种转化研究。本研究旨在进行系统评价,以调查口腔无疾病和有疾病犬的口腔生物体液蛋白质组学特征之间的异同。
未对文献出版语言或年份进行限制,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 中进行检索,以解决以下重点问题:“健康犬和患病(口腔)犬的生物流体的蛋白质组特征是什么?”对最丰富的蛋白质进行基因本体论(GO)富集和京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径分析。此外,还进行了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用分析。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的流行数据报告研究的关键评估清单评估纳入研究的偏倚风险(RoB)。
在健康犬中,蛋白质组分析鉴定出 5451 种蛋白质,其中 137 种是最丰富的,主要与“先天免疫反应”相关。患有口腔疾病的犬显示出 6470 种蛋白质,具有不同的关联:“对细菌的防御反应”(牙周病)、“转录的负调控”(牙垢)和“转录的正调控”(口腔肿瘤)。聚类分析表明在每种情况下都存在显著的蛋白质聚类,强调了健康和口腔疾病中不同的分子特征。只有六份研究报告提交给了 JBI 工具,因为它们包含了将健康犬与患有口腔疾病的犬进行比较的病例对照评估。所有纳入的研究均被认为具有低 RoB(高质量)。
发现口腔无疾病和有疾病犬的口腔生物体液蛋白质组学特征存在显著差异。尽管在结果验证方面仍存在挑战,但动物蛋白质组学和生物信息学的协同作用为跨物种研究提供了一个有前途的途径。