Suppr超能文献

聚焦超声治疗癫痫:临床前和临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Focused ultrasound for treatment of epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical and clinical studies.

机构信息

School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Neurosurgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Nov 10;47(1):839. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03078-5.

Abstract

Various preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the neuromodulatory and ablative effects of focused ultrasound (FUS). However, the safety and efficacy of FUS in clinical settings for treating epilepsy have not been well established. This study aims to provide a systematic review of all preclinical and clinical studies that have used FUS for the treatment of epilepsy. A systematic search was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases. All preclinical and clinical studies reporting outcomes of FUS in the treatment of epilepsy were included in the systematic review. Random-effect meta-analysis was performed to determine safety in clinical studies and seizure activity reduction in preclinical studies. A total of 24 articles were included in the study. Meta-analysis demonstrated that adverse events occurred in 13% (95% CI = 2-57%) of patients with epilepsy who underwent FUS. The frequency of adverse events was higher with the use of FUS for lesioning (36%, 95% CI = 4-88%) in comparison to neuromodulation (5%, 95% CI = 0-71%), although this difference was not significant (P = 0.31). Three-level meta-analysis in preclinical studies demonstrated a reduced spike rate in neuromodulating FUS compared to the control group (P = 0.02). According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, FUS can be considered a safe and feasible approach for treating epileptic seizures, especially in drug-resistant patients. While the efficacy of FUS has been demonstrated in several preclinical studies, further research is necessary to confirm its effectiveness in clinical practice and to determine the adverse events.

摘要

各种临床前和临床研究已经证明了聚焦超声(FUS)的神经调节和消融作用。然而,FUS 在治疗癫痫的临床环境中的安全性和疗效尚未得到很好的确立。本研究旨在对所有使用 FUS 治疗癫痫的临床前和临床研究进行系统评价。使用 Scopus、Web of Science、PubMed 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统搜索。所有报告 FUS 治疗癫痫结果的临床前和临床研究均纳入系统评价。对临床研究中的安全性和临床前研究中的癫痫发作减少进行了随机效应荟萃分析。共有 24 篇文章纳入了本研究。荟萃分析表明,接受 FUS 治疗的癫痫患者中有 13%(95%置信区间 = 2-57%)发生了不良事件。与神经调节(5%,95%置信区间 = 0-71%)相比,使用 FUS 进行病变(36%,95%置信区间 = 4-88%)时不良事件的发生频率更高,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义(P = 0.31)。临床前研究中的三级荟萃分析表明,与对照组相比,神经调节 FUS 可降低尖峰率(P = 0.02)。根据本系统评价和荟萃分析,FUS 可被认为是治疗癫痫发作的一种安全可行的方法,特别是在耐药患者中。虽然 FUS 的疗效已在几项临床前研究中得到证实,但仍需要进一步研究来确认其在临床实践中的有效性,并确定不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验