Department of Public Health, California State University, East Bay. SF 102. 25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard, 94542, Hayward, CA, USA.
Department of Psychology, California State University, East Bay. 25800 Carlos Bee Boulevard, 94542, Hayward, CA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;24(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18240-3.
Students of color disproportionately experience racial discrimination and food insecurity, which both lead to poor academic and health outcomes. This study explores the extent to which the location of racial discrimination experienced is associated with food insecurity, stress, physical health and grade point average among college students METHODS: A cross sectional study design was implemented to survey 143 students from a racially diverse public university. Logistic regression models assessed if discrimination at various locations was associated with food insecurity and linear models assessed how racial discrimination was associated with physical health, stress and grade point average RESULTS: Student's experiencing food security had an average discrimination score of 2.3 (1.23, 3.37), while those experiencing food insecurity had a statistically significant (P < 0.001) higher average discrimination score 7.3 (5.4, 9.21). Experiencing any racial discrimination was associated with increased odds of experiencing food insecurity when experienced from the police (OR 11.76, 95% CI: 1.41, 97.86), in the housing process (OR 7.9, 95% CI: 1.93, 32.34) and in the hiring process (OR 6.81, 95% CI: 1.98, 23.48) compared to those experiencing no racial discrimination after adjusting for race, gender, age and income.
The location in which a student experienced racial discrimination impacted the extent to which the racial discrimination was associated with food security status. Further research is needed to explore potential mechanisms for how racial discrimination may lead to food insecurity.
有色人种学生经历种族歧视和粮食不安全的比例不成比例,这两者都导致学业和健康状况不佳。本研究探讨了学生经历种族歧视的地点与粮食不安全、压力、身体健康和绩点之间的关系。
采用横断面研究设计,对一所种族多样化的公立大学的 143 名学生进行了调查。逻辑回归模型评估了不同地点的歧视是否与粮食不安全有关,线性模型评估了种族歧视与身体健康、压力和绩点之间的关系。
经历粮食安全的学生平均歧视得分为 2.3(1.23,3.37),而经历粮食不安全的学生平均歧视得分有统计学意义(P<0.001),为 7.3(5.4,9.21)。经历任何种族歧视与经历粮食不安全的几率增加有关,当这种歧视来自警察(OR 11.76,95%CI:1.41,97.86)、住房过程(OR 7.9,95%CI:1.93,32.34)和招聘过程(OR 6.81,95%CI:1.98,23.48)时,与经历无种族歧视相比。在调整了种族、性别、年龄和收入等因素后,这种关联仍然存在。
学生经历种族歧视的地点影响了种族歧视与粮食安全状况之间的关联程度。需要进一步研究探索种族歧视如何导致粮食不安全的潜在机制。