Suppr超能文献

军事外科复苏小组的定性研究:快速反应小组成功的驱动因素是什么?

Qualitative investigation of military surgical resuscitation teams: what are the drivers of success of a rapid response team?

机构信息

Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 23;14(3):e076000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076000.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This qualitative study explores the characteristics of a specialised military medical rapid response team (MRRT), the surgical resuscitation team (SRT). Despite mixed evidence of efficacy, civilian MRRTs are widely employed, with significant variation in structure and function. Recent increased use of these teams to mitigate patient risk in challenging healthcare scenarios, such as global pandemics, mass casualty events and resource-constrained health systems, mandates a reconceptualisation of how civilian MRRTs are created, trained and used. Here, we study the core functions and foundational underpinnings of SRTs and discuss how civilian MRRTs might learn from their military counterparts.

DESIGN

Semistructured interview-based study using Descriptive Qualitative Research methodology and Thematic Analysis.

SETTING

Remote audio interviews conducted via Zoom.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants included 15 members of the United States Special Operations Command SRTs, representing all medical specialties of the SRT as well as operational planners.

RESULTS

Adaptability was identified as a core function of SRTs and informed by four foundational underpinnings: mission variability, shared values and principles, interpersonal and organisational trust and highly effective teaming. Our findings provide three important insights for civilian MRRTs: (1) team member roles should not be defined by silos of professional specialisation, (2) trust is a key factor in the teaming process and (3) team principles and values result in and are reinforced by organisational trust.

CONCLUSION

This study offers the first in-depth investigation of a unique military MRRT. Important insights that may offer benefit to civilian MRRT practices include enabling the breakdown of traditional division of labour, allowing for and promoting deep interpersonal and professional familiarity, and facilitating a cycle of positive reinforcement between teams and organisations. Future investigation of small team limitations, comparability to civilian MRRTs, and the team relationship to the larger organisation are needed to better understand how these teams function in a healthcare system and translate to civilian practice.

摘要

目的

本定性研究探讨了特种军事医疗快速反应部队(MRRT),即外科复苏小组(SRT)的特点。尽管关于其疗效的证据存在差异,但民用 MRRT 已被广泛应用,其结构和功能存在显著差异。最近,这些团队在应对全球大流行、大规模伤亡事件和资源受限的卫生系统等具有挑战性的医疗场景中,越来越多地被用于降低患者风险,这就要求重新考虑如何创建、培训和使用民用 MRRT。在这里,我们研究了 SRT 的核心功能和基础,并讨论了民用 MRRT 如何从军事同行那里吸取经验教训。

设计

使用描述性定性研究方法和主题分析进行半结构化访谈研究。

设置

通过 Zoom 进行远程音频访谈。

参与者

参与者包括来自美国特种作战司令部 SRT 的 15 名成员,代表 SRT 的所有医疗专业以及运营规划人员。

结果

适应性被确定为 SRT 的核心功能,其基础是四个方面:任务多样性、共同的价值观和原则、人际和组织信任以及高效的团队合作。我们的研究结果为民用 MRRT 提供了三个重要的启示:(1)团队成员的角色不应按照专业分工的孤岛来定义,(2)信任是团队合作过程中的一个关键因素,(3)团队原则和价值观产生并通过组织信任得到加强。

结论

本研究首次深入调查了一支独特的军事 MRRT。对于可能有益于民用 MRRT 实践的重要见解包括:能够打破传统的劳动分工,允许并促进深入的人际和专业熟悉程度,以及促进团队与组织之间的积极反馈循环。未来需要对小团队的局限性、与民用 MRRT 的可比性以及团队与更大组织的关系进行调查,以更好地了解这些团队在医疗体系中的运作方式,并将其转化为民用实践。

相似文献

2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident and nurse attitudes toward a rapid response team in a tertiary hospital in South Korea.
Acute Crit Care. 2025 Feb;40(1):29-37. doi: 10.4266/acc.004272. Epub 2025 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Definition, Measurement, Precursors, and Outcomes of Trust Within Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review.
Acad Med. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):106-117. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005320. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
2
High reliability organising in healthcare: still a long way left to go.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Dec;31(12):845-848. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014141. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
3
Hospital Planning for Contingency and Crisis Conditions: Crisis Standards of Care Lessons from COVID-19.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Jun-Jul;48(6-7):354-361. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.02.003. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
4
An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research.
J Res Nurs. 2020 Aug;25(5):443-455. doi: 10.1177/1744987119880234. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Rapid Response Teams as a Patient Safety Practice for Failure to Rescue.
JAMA. 2021 Jul 13;326(2):179-180. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.7510.
6
Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131.
Med Teach. 2020 Aug;42(8):846-854. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030. Epub 2020 May 1.
7
Rapid Response and Cardiac Arrest Teams: A Descriptive Analysis of 103 American Hospitals.
Crit Care Explor. 2019 Aug 7;1(8):e0031. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000031. eCollection 2019 Aug.
8
Entrustable professional activities in health care education: a scoping review.
Med Educ. 2019 Aug;53(8):766-777. doi: 10.1111/medu.13879. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Emergency response teams in and outside of medicine-structurally crafted to be worlds apart.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jan;86(1):134-140. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002073.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验