Suppr超能文献

医疗保健团队内部信任的定义、测量、前因和结果:范围综述。

Definition, Measurement, Precursors, and Outcomes of Trust Within Health Care Teams: A Scoping Review.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2024 Jan 1;99(1):106-117. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005320. Epub 2023 Jul 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This scoping review aims to map the breadth of the literature examining how trust is defined in health care teams, describe what measurements of trust are used, and investigate the precursors and outcomes of trust.

METHOD

Five electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Embase, and ASSIA [Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts]) were searched alongside sources of gray literature in February 2021. To be included, studies needed to discuss a health care team directly involved in managing patient care and one aspect of trust as a relational concept. A content count of the definitions of trust and tools used to measure trust and a deductive thematic analysis of the precursors and outcomes of trust in health care teams were conducted.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 157 studies were included after full-text review. Trust was the main focus of 18 (11%) studies and was not routinely defined (38, 24%). Ability appeared to be key to the definition. Trust was measured in 34 (22%) studies, often using a bespoke measure (8/34, 24%). The precursors of trust within health care teams occur at the individual, team, and organizational levels. The outcomes of trust occur at the individual, team, and patient levels. Communication was a broad overarching theme that was present at all levels, both as a precursor and outcome of trust. Respect, as a precursor, influenced trust at the individual, team, and organizational levels, while trust influenced learning, an outcome, across the patient, individual, and team levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Trust is a complex, multilevel construct. This scoping review has highlighted gaps in the literature, including exploration of the swift trust model, which may be applicable to health care teams. Furthermore, knowledge from this review may be integrated into future training and health care practices to optimize team processes and teamworking.

摘要

目的

本范围综述旨在绘制考察医疗保健团队中信任如何定义的文献广度,描述用于衡量信任的测量方法,并研究信任的前因和结果。

方法

2021 年 2 月,在 Ovid MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Embase 和 ASSIA(应用社会科学索引和摘要)五个电子数据库中进行了搜索,并结合灰色文献来源进行了搜索。纳入的研究需要直接讨论参与管理患者护理的医疗保健团队和信任的一个关系概念方面。对信任的定义和用于衡量信任的工具进行了内容计数,并对医疗保健团队中信任的前因和结果进行了演绎主题分析。

结果

最终,在全文审查后,有 157 项研究被纳入。信任是 18 项(11%)研究的主要焦点,且未常规定义(38 项,24%)。能力似乎是定义的关键。在 34 项(22%)研究中测量了信任,通常使用定制的测量方法(8/34,24%)。医疗保健团队中信任的前因发生在个人、团队和组织层面。信任的结果发生在个人、团队和患者层面。沟通是一个广泛的主题,存在于所有层面,既是信任的前因,也是信任的结果。作为前因,尊重影响个人、团队和组织层面的信任,而信任则影响患者、个人和团队层面的学习这一结果。

结论

信任是一个复杂的多层次结构。本范围综述突出了文献中的空白,包括对可能适用于医疗保健团队的快速信任模型的探索。此外,本综述中的知识可整合到未来的培训和医疗保健实践中,以优化团队流程和团队合作。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验