低剂量最大强度与控制节奏阻力训练对未经训练的健康成年人生活质量、功能能力和力量的比较:一项比较效果研究。
Comparison of low-dose maximal-intent versus controlled-tempo resistance training on quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength in untrained healthy adults: a comparative effectiveness study.
作者信息
Pearson Liam T, Fox Kai T, Keenan Ashleigh, Behm David G, Stuart Sam, Goodall Stuart, Barry Gill
机构信息
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CA, USA.
出版信息
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar 23;16(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00847-z.
Lack of physical activity is a global issue for adults that can lead to sedentary behaviour and a higher prevalence of health complications and chronic diseases, resulting in reduced quality-of-life (QoL) and functional capacity (FC). A potential strategy to mitigate this inactivity is low-dose resistance training (RT); however, physiological, and psychological responses are limited in evidence. Twenty untrained participants aged 30-60 years old (mean ± SD age 42 ± 7 years, mass 77 ± 13 kg, stature 166 ± 8 cm; 18 females and two males) were recruited and randomly assigned to maximal velocity-intent (MI, n = 10) or controlled-tempo (CT, n = 10) RT according to CONsolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. Participants attended one training session per week for 6 weeks, consisting of five sets of five repetitions at 60% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) leg press. The interventions differed only during the concentric phase, with MI group pushing with maximal intent, and CT group pushing in a time-controlled manner (3 s). Outcome measures assessed pre- and post-RT included body mass, body mass index (BMI), strength-to-mass ratio, bipedal balance, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), 30-second sit-to-stand (30s-STS), timed up and go (TUG), and leg press 1RM. Time effects were observed for all demographics and FC-related outcomes, such as identical reductions in mass and BMI (- 2%), improvements in strength-to-mass ratio (25%) leg press 1RM (22%), 6MWT (3%), and 30s-STS (14%), as well as a 9% improvement in both TUG-clockwise and anticlockwise. Results show low-dose once-weekly RT is effective in improving QoL, FC, and strength in untrained healthy adults, regardless of modality. Positive responses from participants suggest an increased likelihood of consistent participation for low-dose once-weekly RT over more intense modalities. Retrospective ClinicalTrials.gov ID (TRN): NCT06107855, 24/10/2023.
缺乏体育活动是成年人面临的一个全球性问题,可能导致久坐行为以及健康并发症和慢性病的患病率更高,从而降低生活质量(QoL)和功能能力(FC)。缓解这种不活动状态的一种潜在策略是低剂量抗阻训练(RT);然而,生理和心理反应的证据有限。招募了20名年龄在30至60岁之间的未经训练的参与者(平均年龄±标准差为42±7岁,体重77±13千克,身高166±8厘米;18名女性和2名男性),并根据《试验报告的统一标准》(CONSORT)指南将他们随机分配到最大速度意图组(MI,n = 10)或控制节奏组(CT,n = 10)进行抗阻训练。参与者每周参加一次训练课程,共6周,包括以一次重复最大值(1RM)的60%进行五组,每组五次腿部推举。干预措施仅在向心阶段有所不同,MI组以最大意图推,CT组以时间控制的方式(3秒)推。评估RT前后的结果指标包括体重、体重指数(BMI)、力量与体重比、双足平衡、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)、30秒坐立试验(30s - STS)、计时起立行走试验(TUG)和腿部推举1RM。在所有人口统计学和与FC相关的结果中都观察到了时间效应,例如体重和BMI同样下降(-2%),力量与体重比提高(25%),腿部推举1RM提高(22%),6MWT提高(3%),30s - STS提高(14%),以及TUG顺时针和逆时针方向均提高9%。结果表明,无论训练方式如何,低剂量每周一次的抗阻训练对改善未经训练的健康成年人的生活质量、功能能力和力量是有效的。参与者的积极反应表明,与更强化的训练方式相比,低剂量每周一次的抗阻训练持续参与的可能性增加。回顾性ClinicalTrials.gov标识符(TRN):NCT06107855,2023年10月24日。