Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Institute of Health Behaviors and Community Sciences, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Community Health. 2024 Dec;49(6):967-976. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01347-4. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
In Taiwan, hesitancy regarding COVID-19 vaccination centered more on the choice of vaccine brand than on the decision to vaccinate. However, there is limited research exploring the factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine brand preferences from a sociopolitical perspective. Thus, we aimed to examine how Taiwanese national identity and trust in government influence vaccination status and vaccine brand choice, using longitudinal data from 2020, 2021, and 2023. This study utilized data from the Taiwan Panel Study of Family Dynamics 2020 survey, and combined it with data from two self-administered surveys conducted in 2021 and 2023. We focused on four vaccines commonly administered in Taiwan: AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and the domestically-developed Medigen. Using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors, we assessed the effects of national identity and trust in government on the choice of COVID-19 vaccine brand. By analyzing data from 2361 participants, we found that national identity and trust in government were associated with the likelihood of COVID-19 vaccination, the number of vaccine doses received, and the brand of vaccine taken. Those who identified themselves as Taiwanese were more inclined to receive the Medigen and AstraZeneca vaccines, but less willing to receive Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Those who trusted the government were more likely to prefer and receive the Medigen vaccine. Conversely, those who didn't trust the government were less likely to prefer Medigen and AstraZeneca vaccines, but were willing to receive Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. Vaccine brand preferences and uptake in Taiwan were affected by individuals' national identity and their trust in government. This highlights the critical role of sociopolitical factors in shaping public health strategies.
在台湾,对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫主要集中在疫苗品牌的选择上,而不是接种疫苗的决定上。然而,从社会政治角度探讨影响 COVID-19 疫苗品牌偏好的因素的研究有限。因此,我们旨在利用 2020 年、2021 年和 2023 年的纵向数据,从社会政治角度探讨台湾人的民族认同和对政府的信任如何影响接种状况和疫苗品牌选择。本研究利用了 2020 年家庭动态台湾面板研究调查的数据,并将其与 2021 年和 2023 年进行的两次自我管理调查的数据相结合。我们重点关注了台湾常用的四种疫苗:阿斯利康、莫德纳、辉瑞-生物技术和本土研发的联亚生技。我们使用具有稳健标准误差的泊松回归模型评估了民族认同和对政府的信任对 COVID-19 疫苗品牌选择的影响。通过分析 2361 名参与者的数据,我们发现民族认同和对政府的信任与 COVID-19 疫苗接种的可能性、接种疫苗的剂量和接种的疫苗品牌有关。那些自认为是台湾人的人更倾向于接种联亚生技和阿斯利康疫苗,但不太愿意接种辉瑞-生物技术疫苗。那些信任政府的人更倾向于选择和接种联亚生技疫苗。相反,那些不信任政府的人不太愿意选择和接种联亚生技和阿斯利康疫苗,但愿意接种辉瑞-生物技术疫苗。台湾的疫苗品牌偏好和接种情况受到个人民族认同和对政府信任的影响。这凸显了社会政治因素在塑造公共卫生策略方面的关键作用。