Buddiga Natalie R, Locey Matthew L
Salve Regina University, Department of Psychology, 100 Ochre Point Avenue, Newport, RI 02840, USA.
Hampden-Sydney College, Department of Psychology, 172 Via Sacra, Hampden Sydney, VA 23943, USA.
Behav Processes. 2024 Apr;217:105024. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105024. Epub 2024 Mar 24.
Probability and reciprocation have been implicated as key variables for understanding altruism and cooperation. Social discounting, which describes the decline in reward value as the recipient increases in social distance, has provided a framework through which to examine altruistic and cooperative choice. A previous study introduced reciprocal discounting as a way of studying perceived altruism from others (termed reciprocal altruism). But probability discounting has not yet been examined in relation to reciprocal discounting. In order to extend research on reciprocal discounting, the present study evaluated correlations between social, reciprocal, and probability discounting as well as relations between standard social distance (used in social discounting) and reciprocal social distance (the participant's perceived social distance placement on someone else's list) among 129 participants. Upon evaluation, the fit of median reciprocal discount rates to the hyperbolic form was replicated. A strong correlation between social and reciprocal discount rates and a moderate correlation between social and probability discount rates were found as well. Additionally, reciprocal and probability discount rates yielded moderate correlations while reciprocal and standard social distance analyses revealed more correspondence between reward values when persons were socially close (i.e., Person 1) or socially distant (i.e., Person 100). This study provides further evidence that reciprocation and probability likely impact altruistic choice while laying groundwork for further investigations into social distance.
概率和互惠被认为是理解利他主义与合作的关键变量。社会折扣描述了随着接受者社会距离的增加奖励价值的下降,它为研究利他主义和合作选择提供了一个框架。之前的一项研究引入了互惠折扣,作为研究他人感知到的利他主义(称为互惠利他主义)的一种方式。但概率折扣与互惠折扣的关系尚未得到研究。为了扩展对互惠折扣的研究,本研究评估了129名参与者中社会折扣、互惠折扣和概率折扣之间的相关性,以及标准社会距离(用于社会折扣)和互惠社会距离(参与者对他人名单上自身社会距离位置的感知)之间的关系。经评估,中位数互惠折扣率与双曲线形式的拟合得到了重复。研究还发现社会折扣率与互惠折扣率之间存在强相关性,社会折扣率与概率折扣率之间存在中度相关性。此外,互惠折扣率与概率折扣率之间存在中度相关性,而互惠折扣与标准社会距离分析表明,当人们在社会上亲近(即人物1)或社会距离较远(即人物100)时,奖励价值之间的对应性更强。这项研究提供了进一步的证据,表明互惠和概率可能会影响利他主义选择,同时为进一步研究社会距离奠定了基础。