• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR):一名37岁孕妇罕见颈动脉夹层的最佳手术干预选择

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR): The Best Surgical Intervention Option in an Unusual Presentation of Carotid Dissection in a 37-Year-Old Pregnant Female.

作者信息

Oye Herbert, Abbas Nitasha

机构信息

Endovascular and Vascular Surgery, Raleigh General Hospital, Beckley, USA.

Endovascular and Vascular Surgery, West Virginia Vascular Institute, Beckley, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54600. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54600. eCollection 2024 Feb.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.54600
PMID:38523914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10958752/
Abstract

Carotid artery dissection (CAD) is a condition that compromises blood flow and leads to serious complications such as a stroke or cerebrovascular accident (CVA). This case report demonstrates an unusual case of right internal carotid artery dissection, stenosis of >70%, and an intraluminal thrombus. The patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of right-sided neck pain and severe headache status-post a complicated pregnancy. A computed tomography (CT) angiogram of the right carotid was conducted and showed a right internal carotid artery dissection with 70% luminal stenosis and thrombosis. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA), transfemoral carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS), or transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) were all surgical intervention options that were explored. Risks and benefits were compared between the three surgical intervention options, and transcarotid artery revascularization was deemed the best surgical option in this patient's case.

摘要

颈动脉夹层(CAD)是一种影响血流并导致严重并发症(如中风或脑血管意外[CVA])的病症。本病例报告展示了一例罕见的右侧颈内动脉夹层、管腔狭窄超过70%并伴有腔内血栓形成的病例。该患者因右侧颈部疼痛和严重头痛就诊于急诊科,其有复杂的妊娠史。对右侧颈动脉进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影,结果显示右侧颈内动脉夹层伴管腔70%狭窄和血栓形成。颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)、经股动脉颈动脉血管成形术加支架置入术(CAS)或经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)都是探讨过的手术干预选项。对这三种手术干预选项的风险和益处进行了比较,经颈动脉血管重建术被认为是该患者病例中的最佳手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/7e1ab22f1de4/cureus-0016-00000054600-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/fb14ef2e1cf2/cureus-0016-00000054600-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/5edb10154799/cureus-0016-00000054600-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/65598fcd0089/cureus-0016-00000054600-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/eb5b8d085539/cureus-0016-00000054600-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/7f9704f02b6a/cureus-0016-00000054600-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/7e1ab22f1de4/cureus-0016-00000054600-i06.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/fb14ef2e1cf2/cureus-0016-00000054600-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/5edb10154799/cureus-0016-00000054600-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/65598fcd0089/cureus-0016-00000054600-i03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/eb5b8d085539/cureus-0016-00000054600-i04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/7f9704f02b6a/cureus-0016-00000054600-i05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97f3/10958752/7e1ab22f1de4/cureus-0016-00000054600-i06.jpg

相似文献

1
Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR): The Best Surgical Intervention Option in an Unusual Presentation of Carotid Dissection in a 37-Year-Old Pregnant Female.经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR):一名37岁孕妇罕见颈动脉夹层的最佳手术干预选择
Cureus. 2024 Feb 21;16(2):e54600. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54600. eCollection 2024 Feb.
2
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Analysis of the anatomic eligibility for transcarotid artery revascularization in Chinese patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.对接受颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的中国患者进行经颈动脉血管重建术的解剖学适宜性分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 6;9:1045598. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1045598. eCollection 2022.
4
The impact of age on in-hospital outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and carotid endarterectomy.年龄对经颈动脉血管重建术、经股颈动脉血管支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术住院治疗结果的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Sep;72(3):931-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.037. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Procedural Safety Comparison Between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Carotid Stenting: Perioperative and 1-Year Rates of Stroke or Death.经颈动脉血运重建术、颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的围手术期和 1 年卒中或死亡率的操作安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e024964. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024964. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
7
Outcomes of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Carotid Endarterectomy at a Single Institution.单中心颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的结果。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.10.023. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
Association of carotid revascularization approach with perioperative outcomes based on symptom status and degree of stenosis among octogenarians.基于症状和狭窄程度,80 岁及以上人群颈动脉血运重建方法与围手术期结局的相关性。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Sep;76(3):769-777.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 25.
9
Estimated Cost of Transcarotid Arterial Revascularization Compared With Carotid Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Carotid Stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术及经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术相比的估计成本。
Cureus. 2022 Mar 27;14(3):e23539. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23539. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy and transfemoral stenting in octogenarians.经颈动脉血管重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术和股动脉支架置入术治疗 80 岁以上患者的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Nov;74(5):1602-1608. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.028. Epub 2021 May 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Postpartum cerebral arterial dissections: Clinical features and treatment.产后颅内动脉夹层:临床特征与治疗。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Nov 24;100(47):e27798. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027798.
2
Spontaneous carotid artery dissection: a rare cause of stroke in pregnancy and approach to diagnosis and management.自发性颈动脉夹层:妊娠期卒中的罕见病因及诊断与处理方法
Conn Med. 2014 Jun-Jul;78(6):349-52.
3
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.
颈动脉内膜切除术指南:美国心脏协会中风委员会特别写作小组为医疗专业人员发布的声明
Stroke. 1998 Feb;29(2):554-62. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.2.554.