Suppr超能文献

替代支付模式与患者报告的出院准备质量:一项回顾性纵向研究

Alternative Payment Models and Patient-Reported Quality of Preparation for Discharge: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

作者信息

Lin Sunny C, Adler-Milstein Julia, Hollingsworth John M, Ryan Andrew

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.

University of California San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Exp. 2024 Mar 22;11:23743735241240926. doi: 10.1177/23743735241240926. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Preparing patients for posthospital care may improve readmission risk. Alternative payment models (APMs) incent hospitals to reduce readmissions by tying payment to outcomes. The impact of APMs on preparation for discharge is not well understood. We assessed whether patient-reported preparation for posthospital care was associated with reduced readmissions, and whether APM participation was associated with improved preparation for posthospital care. We used mixed-effects regression on retrospective (2013-2017) observational data for 2685 U.S. hospitals. We measured patient-reported preparation for posthospital care using the 3-Item Care Transition Measure and readmission using 30-day all-cause risk-adjusted readmissions from Hospital Compare. Participation in accountable care organizations (ACOs), Medical Homes, and Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement program was obtained from Medicare, the American Hospital Association's Annual Survey, and Leavitt Partner's ACO database. We found that APMs are not associated with improved preparation for posthospital care, even though it was associated with reduced readmissions (Marginal Effect: -0.012 percentage points). This may be because hospitals are not investing in patient engagement. This study has limited insight into causality and reduced generalizability among smaller, rural, and non-teaching hospitals.

摘要

让患者为出院后护理做好准备可能会降低再入院风险。替代支付模式(APM)通过将支付与结果挂钩来激励医院减少再入院率。APM对出院准备的影响尚不清楚。我们评估了患者报告的出院后护理准备是否与再入院率降低相关,以及参与APM是否与出院后护理准备的改善相关。我们对2685家美国医院的回顾性(2013 - 2017年)观察数据进行了混合效应回归分析。我们使用3项护理过渡测量指标来衡量患者报告的出院后护理准备情况,并使用医院比较网站提供的30天全因风险调整后的再入院率来衡量再入院情况。参与责任医疗组织(ACO)、医疗之家以及医疗保险的改善护理捆绑支付计划的数据来自医疗保险、美国医院协会年度调查以及莱维特合作伙伴的ACO数据库。我们发现,APM与出院后护理准备的改善并无关联,尽管它与再入院率降低相关(边际效应:-0.012个百分点)。这可能是因为医院没有在患者参与方面进行投入。本研究对因果关系的洞察有限,且在规模较小的农村医院和非教学医院中的普遍性有所降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/438d/10958805/c5056cf336cb/10.1177_23743735241240926-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验