Ryan Andrew M, Krinsky Sam, Adler-Milstein Julia, Damberg Cheryl L, Maurer Kristin A, Hollingsworth John M
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.
Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor2University of Michigan School of Information, Ann Arbor.
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):862-868. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0518.
Medicare is experimenting with numerous concurrent reforms aimed at improving quality and value for hospitals. It is unclear if these myriad reforms are mutually reinforcing or in conflict with each other.
To evaluate whether hospital participation in voluntary value-based reforms was associated with greater improvement under Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective, longitudinal study using publicly available national data from Hospital Compare on hospital readmissions for 2837 hospitals from 2008 to 2015. We assessed hospital participation in 3 voluntary value-based reforms: Meaningful Use of Electronic Health Records; the Bundled Payment for Care Initiative episode-based payment program (BPCI); and Medicare's Pioneer and Shared Savings accountable care organization (ACO) programs. We used an interrupted time series design to test whether hospitals' time-varying participation in these value-based reforms was associated with greater improvement in Medicare's HRRP.
Thirty-day risk standardized readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia.
Among the 2837 hospitals in this study, participation in value-based reforms varied considerably over the study period. In 2010, no hospitals were participating in the meaningful use, ACO, or BPCI programs. By 2015, only 56 hospitals were not participating in at least 1 of these programs. Among hospitals that did not participate in any voluntary reforms, the association between the HRRP and 30-day readmission was -0.76 percentage points for AMI (95% CI, -0.93 to -0.60), -1.30 percentage points for heart failure (95% CI, -1.47 to -1.13), and -0.82 percentage points for pneumonia (95% CI, -0.97 to -0.67). Participation in the meaningful use program alone was associated with an additional change in 30-day readmissions of -0.78 percentage points for AMI (95% CI, -0.89 to -0.67), -0.97 percentage points for heart failure (95% CI, -1.08 to -0.86), and -0.56 percentage points for pneumonia (95% CI, -0.65 to -0.47). Participation in ACO programs alone was associated with an additional change in 30-day readmissions of -0.94 percentage points for AMI (95% CI, -1.29 to -0.59), -0.83 percentage points for heart failure (95% CI, -1.26 to -0.41), and -0.59 percentage points for pneumonia (95% CI, -1.00 to -0.18). Participation in multiple reforms led to greater improvement: participation in all 3 programs was associated with an additional change in 30-day readmissions of -1.27 percentage points for AMI (95% CI, -1.58 to -0.97), -1.64 percentage points for heart failure (95% CI, -2.02 to -1.26), and -1.05 percentage points for pneumonia (95% CI, -1.32 to -0.78).
Hospital participation in voluntary value-based reforms was associated with greater reductions in readmissions. Our findings lend support for Medicare's multipronged strategy to improve hospital quality and value.
医疗保险正在进行多项同步改革,旨在提高医院的质量和价值。目前尚不清楚这些众多的改革是相互促进还是相互冲突。
评估医院参与自愿性基于价值的改革是否与医疗保险的医院再入院率降低计划(HRRP)下的更大改善相关。
设计、设置和参与者:一项回顾性纵向研究,使用来自医院比较网站的公开可用国家数据,涉及2008年至2015年的2837家医院的再入院情况。我们评估了医院参与的三项自愿性基于价值的改革:电子健康记录的有意义使用;基于捆绑支付的护理计划(BPCI)的按 episode 付费计划;以及医疗保险的先锋和共享储蓄责任医疗组织(ACO)计划。我们使用中断时间序列设计来测试医院在这些基于价值的改革中的随时间变化的参与是否与医疗保险的HRRP的更大改善相关。
急性心肌梗死(AMI)、心力衰竭和肺炎的30天风险标准化再入院率。
在本研究的2837家医院中,在研究期间参与基于价值的改革的情况差异很大。2010年,没有医院参与有意义使用、ACO或BPCI计划。到2015年,只有56家医院没有参与这些计划中的至少一项。在未参与任何自愿改革的医院中,HRRP与30天再入院之间的关联对于AMI为-0.76个百分点(95%CI,-0.93至-0.60),对于心力衰竭为-1.30个百分点(95%CI。-1.47至-1.13),对于肺炎为-0.82个百分点(95%CI,-0.97至-0.67)。仅参与有意义使用计划与30天再入院的额外变化相关,对于AMI为-0.78个百分点(95%CI,-0.89至-0.67),对于心力衰竭为-0.97个百分点(95%CI,-1.08至-0.86),对于肺炎为-0.56个百分点(95%CI,-0.65至-0.47)。仅参与ACO计划与30天再入院的额外变化相关,对于AMI为-0.94个百分点(95%CI,-1.29至-0.59),对于心力衰竭为-0.83个百分点(95%CI,-1.26至-0.41),对于肺炎为-0.59个百分点(95%CI,-1.00至-0.18)。参与多项改革带来了更大的改善:参与所有三项计划与30天再入院的额外变化相关,对于AMI为-1.27个百分点(95%CI,-1.58至-0.97),对于心力衰竭为-1.64个百分点(95%CI,-2.