• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植等待名单上患者的种族和性别对供体心脏接受情况的差异。

Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.

作者信息

Breathett Khadijah, Knapp Shannon M, Lewsey Sabra C, Mohammed Selma F, Mazimba Sula, Dunlay Shannon M, Hicks Albert, Ilonze Onyedika J, Morris Alanna A, Tedford Ryan J, Colvin Monica M, Daly Richard C

机构信息

Krannert Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1379-1386. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0065.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2024.0065
PMID:38526480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10964157/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Barriers to heart transplant must be overcome prior to listing. It is unclear why Black men and women remain less likely to receive a heart transplant after listing than White men and women.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether race or gender of a heart transplant candidate (ie, patient on the transplant waiting list) is associated with the probability of a donor heart being accepted by the transplant center team with each offer.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used the United Network for Organ Sharing datasets to identify organ acceptance with each offer for US non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black) and non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White) adults listed for heart transplant from October 18, 2018, through March 31, 2023.

EXPOSURES

Black or White race and gender (men, women) of a heart transplant candidate.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcome was heart offer acceptance by the transplant center team. The number of offers to acceptance was assessed using discrete time-to-event analyses, nonparametrically (stratified by race and gender) and parametrically. The hazard probability of offer acceptance for each offer was modeled using generalized linear mixed models adjusted for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables.

RESULTS

Among 159 177 heart offers with 13 760 donors, there were 14 890 candidates listed for heart transplant; 30.9% were Black, 69.1% were White, 73.6% were men, and 26.4% were women. The cumulative incidence of offer acceptance was highest for White women followed by Black women, White men, and Black men (P < .001). Odds of acceptance were less for Black candidates than for White candidates for the first offer (odds ratio [OR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.84) through the 16th offer. Odds of acceptance were higher for women than for men for the first offer (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.39-1.68) through the sixth offer and were lower for the 10th through 31st offers.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The cumulative incidence of heart offer acceptance by a transplant center team was consistently lower for Black candidates than for White candidates of the same gender and higher for women than for men. These disparities persisted after adjusting for candidate-, donor-, and offer-level variables, possibly suggesting racial and gender bias in the decision-making process. Further investigation of site-level decision-making may reveal strategies for equitable donor heart acceptance.

摘要

重要性

在列入名单之前必须克服心脏移植的障碍。目前尚不清楚为何黑人男性和女性在列入名单后接受心脏移植的可能性仍低于白人男性和女性。

目的

评估心脏移植候选人(即移植等待名单上的患者)的种族或性别是否与移植中心团队每次提供供体心脏时接受的概率相关。

设计、设置和参与者:这项队列研究使用器官共享联合网络数据集,以确定2018年10月18日至2023年3月31日期间在美国列入心脏移植名单的非西班牙裔黑人(以下简称黑人)和非西班牙裔白人(以下简称白人)成年人每次提供器官时的接受情况。

暴露因素

心脏移植候选人的黑人或白人种族以及性别(男性、女性)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是移植中心团队接受心脏供体。使用离散事件时间分析对接受供体的次数进行评估,采用非参数方法(按种族和性别分层)和参数方法。使用针对候选人、供体和供体提供层面变量进行调整的广义线性混合模型,对每次提供供体时接受的风险概率进行建模。

结果

在13760名供体提供的159177次心脏供体中,有14890名候选人列入心脏移植名单;其中30.9%为黑人,69.1%为白人,73.6%为男性,26.4%为女性。移植中心团队接受供体的累积发生率最高的是白人女性,其次是黑人女性、白人男性和黑人男性(P < 0.001)。从第一次供体到第16次供体,黑人候选人接受供体的几率低于白人候选人(优势比[OR],0.76;95%置信区间,0.69 - 0.84)。从第一次供体到第六次供体,女性接受供体的几率高于男性(OR,1.53;95%置信区间,1.39 - 1.68),而在第10次到第31次供体时则较低。

结论与意义

移植中心团队接受心脏供体的累积发生率,黑人候选人始终低于同性别白人候选人,女性高于男性。在对候选人、供体和供体提供层面变量进行调整后,这些差异仍然存在,这可能表明决策过程中存在种族和性别偏见。对机构层面决策的进一步调查可能会揭示公平接受供体心脏的策略。

相似文献

1
Differences in Donor Heart Acceptance by Race and Gender of Patients on the Transplant Waiting List.移植等待名单上患者的种族和性别对供体心脏接受情况的差异。
JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1379-1386. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0065.
2
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
3
Is Equity Being Traded for Access to Heart Transplant?心脏移植的公平性是否正被用来换取移植机会?
JAMA. 2024 Apr 23;331(16):1365-1367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.0812.
4
Transplant Center Variability in Organ Offer Acceptance and Mortality Among US Patients on the Heart Transplant Waitlist.美国心脏移植候补患者中器官提供接受率和死亡率的移植中心变异性。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):660-668. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0659.
5
Disparities in liver transplantation before and after introduction of the MELD score.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分引入前后肝移植的差异。
JAMA. 2008 Nov 26;300(20):2371-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.720.
6
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Live Donor Kidney Transplantation in the United States From 1995 to 2014.1995年至2014年美国种族与活体供肾移植的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):49-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19152.
7
Gender and Race Differences in HeartMate3 Left Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Transplantation.作为移植桥梁的HeartMate3左心室辅助装置中的性别和种族差异
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;12(8):1459-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.11.008. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
8
Black Patients Have Unequal Access to Listing for Liver Transplantation in the United States.美国的黑人患者在接受肝移植名单方面存在不平等的机会。
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1523-1532. doi: 10.1002/hep.31837.
9
Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System.种族和民族与美国肾脏分配系统下长寿已故供体肾移植的关系。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Oct;84(4):416-426. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
Modifiable patient characteristics and racial disparities in evaluation completion and living donor transplant.可改变的患者特征与评估完成情况和活体供者移植中的种族差异。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jun;8(6):995-1002. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08880812. Epub 2013 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Heart Failure Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.心力衰竭在流行病学、诊断、管理及预后方面的差异
Cureus. 2025 Sep 7;17(9):e91788. doi: 10.7759/cureus.91788. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Sex Differences in Heart Transplantation: Evolving Trends and Insights.心脏移植中的性别差异:不断演变的趋势与见解
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jul 12;27(1):112. doi: 10.1007/s11886-025-02266-z.
3
OPTN/SRTR 2023 Annual Data Report: Heart.器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络2023年度数据报告:心脏
Am J Transplant. 2025 Feb;25(2S1):S329-S421. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.024.
4
Advancing Health Equity in the Cardiovascular Device Life Cycle.在心血管器械生命周期中推进健康公平。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2025 Mar;18(3):e011310. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011310. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
5
Improving the Prioritization of Heart Transplantation Candidates for Optimal Clinical Outcomes: A Narrative Review.改善心脏移植候选者的优先排序以实现最佳临床结果:一篇叙述性综述。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 8;27(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02150-2.
6
Assessing racial disparities in heart transplant allocations post-2018 policy change.评估2018年政策变更后心脏移植分配中的种族差异。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Aug 24;45:100446. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100446. eCollection 2024 Sep.
7
Race, Gender, and Donor Heart Acceptance-Reply.种族、性别与供体心脏接受情况——回复
JAMA. 2024 Sep 10;332(10):842. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.13723.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Peri-and Post-operative Cardiac Surgery.心脏手术围手术期及术后的种族和族裔差异
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2024;18(7):95-113. doi: 10.1007/s12170-024-00739-4. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
9
Lost in Transplantation: Characterizing Racial Gaps in Physician Organ Offer Acceptance.移植中的迷失:刻画医生器官供体接受方面的种族差异
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 16:2024.07.14.24310395. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.14.24310395.