Kay P H, Natsuume-Sakai S, Hayakawa J, Dawkins R L
Immunogenetics. 1985;22(6):563-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00430304.
To determine whether different forms of C3 degrade at different rates, we compared two strains of mice with a B10 background. The only difference was that one is C3A, while the other is C3B. These strains allow comparison of C3A and C3B without the added complication of differing C3 convertases. Sera from the two strains were incubated with zymosan and the degradation products were detected by immunofixation following electrophoresis in agarose. The rate of degradation of mouse C3B was more rapid than that of C3A. Differences in the rates of degradation could not be explained by differing concentrations of C3. We suggest that the genetic differences in C3 determine the decay rate following activation via the alternate pathway.
为了确定不同形式的C3是否以不同速率降解,我们比较了两种具有B10背景的小鼠品系。唯一的区别在于,一种是C3A,而另一种是C3B。这些品系使得在没有不同C3转化酶这一额外复杂因素的情况下,能够对C3A和C3B进行比较。将这两种品系的血清与酵母聚糖一起温育,并在琼脂糖凝胶电泳后通过免疫固定检测降解产物。小鼠C3B的降解速率比C3A更快。降解速率的差异无法用C3浓度不同来解释。我们认为,C3的基因差异决定了经由替代途径激活后的衰变率。