• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型单髁膝关节系统的早期失败率较高。

High early failure rate for a new unicondylar knee system.

作者信息

Toledo de Araujo Lucio C, Freitag Jens, Kamath Atul F, Sandiford Nemandra A, Kendoff Daniel

机构信息

ENDO Klinik Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Regional Hospital of São José Dr. Homero M Gomes, São José, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

出版信息

Ann Jt. 2022 Dec 1;8:3. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-18. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.21037/aoj-22-18
PMID:38529219
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10929342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This single-center retrospective study evaluated early failure rates for an unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) system with an anti-allergic surface.

METHODS

We studied 87 consecutive joints received an UKA at a single center between 2017 and 2020. All patients received a fully cemented anti-allergic Univation-Aesculap partial knee replacement implant with a corundum blasting surface. All joints had precise indication of unicompartmental arthroplasty according to the current criteria of this procedure. The current series was restricted to patients undergoing medial cemented UKA. Medial compartment osteoarthritis was the main indication.

RESULTS

We found early failure (aseptic loosening) was documented in 20 of the 87 joints (23%). The time to failure ranged from 7 weeks to 3 years, for an estimated 33% (15-46%) cumulative hazard rate for implant loosening over three years. No cases of periprosthetic joint infection were found. On average, the patients began complaining about first symptoms during the third month after surgery. In most cases (66.66%), the cement remained fixed to the bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these early results, the manufacturer of this implant stopped all further distribution. Continued efforts should be made to understand the clinical and radiographic outcomes of alternative and anti-allergic surface coatings in knee arthroplasty.

摘要

背景

本单中心回顾性研究评估了一种具有抗过敏表面的单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)系统的早期失败率。

方法

我们研究了2017年至2020年期间在单一中心连续接受UKA手术的87个关节。所有患者均接受了带有刚玉喷砂表面的全骨水泥固定抗过敏Univation - Aesculap单髁膝关节置换植入物。根据该手术的当前标准,所有关节均有单髁置换的明确指征。本系列研究仅限于接受内侧骨水泥固定UKA的患者。内侧间室骨关节炎是主要指征。

结果

我们发现87个关节中有20个(23%)记录有早期失败(无菌性松动)。失败时间从7周至3年不等,估计三年植入物松动的累积风险率为33%(15 - 46%)。未发现假体周围关节感染病例。平均而言,患者在术后第三个月开始出现首发症状。在大多数情况下(66.66%),骨水泥与骨保持固定。

结论

基于这些早期结果,该植入物制造商停止了所有进一步的分销。应继续努力了解膝关节置换术中替代和抗过敏表面涂层的临床和影像学结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/98e6b3611787/aoj-08-3-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/05c60ef5c3a3/aoj-08-3-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/7d741686473a/aoj-08-3-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/0213897eb1e8/aoj-08-3-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/afdabce3cb01/aoj-08-3-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/60aabead2ea9/aoj-08-3-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/6603b0e9945c/aoj-08-3-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/b8617800f7e6/aoj-08-3-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/98e6b3611787/aoj-08-3-f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/05c60ef5c3a3/aoj-08-3-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/7d741686473a/aoj-08-3-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/0213897eb1e8/aoj-08-3-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/afdabce3cb01/aoj-08-3-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/60aabead2ea9/aoj-08-3-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/6603b0e9945c/aoj-08-3-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/b8617800f7e6/aoj-08-3-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/677d/10929342/98e6b3611787/aoj-08-3-f8.jpg

相似文献

1
High early failure rate for a new unicondylar knee system.一种新型单髁膝关节系统的早期失败率较高。
Ann Jt. 2022 Dec 1;8:3. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-18. eCollection 2023.
2
Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.疾病进展、无菌性松动和假体脱位是外侧单髁膝关节置换术后的主要翻修指征:一项系统评价。
J ISAKOS. 2022 Oct;7(5):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Outcomes of a Fixed-Bearing, Medial, Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Design: Survival Analysis and Functional Score of 460 Cases.固定平台、中置、骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的结果:460 例的生存分析和功能评分。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2792-2799. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.031. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
4
Does unicompartmental knee arthroplasty have worse outcomes in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee than in medial compartment osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换术治疗膝关节自发性骨坏死的效果是否比治疗内侧间室骨关节炎更差?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Mar;139(3):393-403. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03125-7. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
5
Revision indications for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.内侧单髁膝关节置换术的翻修指征:一项系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Feb;142(2):301-314. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03827-x. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
6
Do Fixed or Mobile Bearing Implants Have Better Survivorship in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty? A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.固定或活动平台假体在膝关节单髁置换术中的生存率更高吗?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jul 1;479(7):1548-1558. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001698.
7
Clinical outcomes, complications, and survivorship for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years and older with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis: a matched cohort analysis.80 岁及以上单纯内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者行单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的临床结果、并发症和生存率:匹配队列分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6371-6379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04916-9. Epub 2023 May 27.
8
Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Utilizing a Modified Surgical Technique and Specifically Adapted Fixed-Bearing Implant.采用改良手术技术及特制固定承重植入物的膝关节外侧单髁置换术
Surg Technol Int. 2019 May 15;34:371-378.
9
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: does the type of tibial component selected influence implant survival?单髁膝关节置换术:所选择的胫骨组件类型是否会影响假体的存活率?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jan;144(1):347-355. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05055-x. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
10
Cementless versus cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of comparative studies.非骨水泥型与骨水泥型单髁膝关节置换术的比较:系统综述的比较研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2023 Sep;107(3):255-267. doi: 10.1007/s12306-023-00773-2. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
No advantage for patient-specific UKA in comparison with standard UKA regarding clinical and functional results at short-term follow-up.在短期随访中,与标准单髁置换术相比,患者特异性单髁置换术在临床和功能结果方面并无优势。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Aug 27;35(1):362. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04467-2.

本文引用的文献

1
UNICOMPARTIMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY - 15 YEARS FOLLOW UP.单髁膝关节置换术——15年随访
Acta Ortop Bras. 2020 Sep-Oct;28(5):233-235. doi: 10.1590/1413-785220202805235633.
2
Early Outcomes of an Alternative Bearing Surface in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Self-reported Metal Allergy.自我报告有金属过敏的患者在初次全膝关节置换术中使用替代承重表面的早期结果
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Aug 22;6(4):639-643. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.07.021. eCollection 2020 Dec.
3
Medium-term survival and clinical and radiological results in high tibial osteotomy: Factors for failure and comparison with unicompartmental arthroplasty.
高胫骨截骨术的中期生存及临床和影像学结果:失败因素及与单髁关节置换术的比较。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Dec;106(8S):S223-S230. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
4
Ten-Year Survivorship, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Satisfaction of a Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.固定平台单髁膝关节置换术的十年生存率、患者报告结局及满意度
Arthroplast Today. 2020 Apr 6;6(2):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2020.02.016. eCollection 2020 Jun.
5
Minimum 10-year outcomes of a fixed bearing all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasty used to treat medial osteoarthritis.用于治疗内侧骨关节炎的固定平台全聚乙烯单髁膝关节置换术的至少10年随访结果
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):1018-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
6
Catastrophic failure of biconcave unicompartmental polyethylene bearings.双凹形单室聚乙烯轴承的灾难性失效。
Knee. 2020 Jun;27(3):987-992. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
7
Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.陶瓷涂层后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节置换术的不可接受的失败率。
Arthroplast Today. 2019 Mar 22;5(2):187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.02.002. eCollection 2019 Jun.
8
Failure of a Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement due to Metal Allergy.因金属过敏导致的内侧单髁膝关节置换失败
J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2018;28(4):319-325. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2019030060.
9
2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions.2018 年肌肉骨骼感染国际共识会议:大会提问的研究重点。
J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
10
Hip and Knee Section, What is the Definition of a Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) of the Knee and the Hip? Can the Same Criteria be Used for Both Joints?: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections.髋膝关节部分,膝关节和髋关节假体周围感染(PJI)的定义是什么?两个关节能否使用相同的标准?:骨科感染国际共识会议论文集
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2S):S325-S327. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.045. Epub 2018 Oct 22.