Lázár Zsófia, Horváth Alpár, Kiss-Dala Szilvia, Abonyi-Tóth Zsolt, Csoma Balázs, Kontz Katalin, Tamási Lilla, Müller Veronika
Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Medical Department, Chiesi Hungary Ltd., Budapest, Hungary.
Eur Clin Respir J. 2024 Mar 21;11(1):2328434. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2024.2328434. eCollection 2024.
The criteria for significant bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) were published in 2005 by the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society, which were revised in 2021, however, data on the agreement between these two recommendations in untreated patients with airflow limitation are missing.
We aimed to study BDR to salbutamol (SABA) or ipratropium bromide (SAMA) in patients with suspected bronchial asthma or COPD at initial clinical presentation using the 2005 and 2021 criteria and explore clinical factors associated with BDR+.
Symptomatic, treatment-naïve patients with expiratory airflow limitation ( = 105, 57 men, age (mean ± standard deviation): 65 ± 10 years) underwent BDR testing with 400 mcg salbutamol (day 1) or 80 mcg ipratropium bromide (day 2) and BDR was measured after 15 and 30 minutes. Clinical factors with risk for BDR+ were assessed with binomial logistic regression analysis.
We found a good agreement between the number of 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ patients at 15 and 30 minutes post-salbutamol and post-ipratropium (88.6-94.8%). More patients showed BDR+ after 30 minutes than following 15 minutes using either criterion. When results at 30 minutes are considered, the number of patients with 2005-BDR+ (82%) was higher than that of 2021-BDR+ (75%), with the proportion of SAMA+ patients being higher than that of SABA+ (2005: 70% vs. 49%, Fisher exact < 0.01; 2021: 64% vs. 41%, = 0.001). 2005-BDR+ and 2021-BDR+ to SABA were associated with decreasing pre-BD FEV% predicted and the presence of cough. More patients with asthma were in the SABA+ group compared to the SAMA+ group (2005: 71% vs. 53%, Fischer exact = 0.04; 2021: 77% vs. 52%, = 0.02).
Fewer patients show BDR+ according to the 2021 criteria in comparison with the 2005 recommendations, and protocols for BDR testing may consider the assessment of response to both SABA and SAMA after 30 minutes.
欧洲呼吸学会/美国胸科学会于2005年公布了显著支气管扩张剂反应性(BDR)的标准,该标准于2021年进行了修订,然而,在未经治疗的气流受限患者中,关于这两项建议之间一致性的数据缺失。
我们旨在使用2005年和2021年的标准,研究疑似支气管哮喘或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者在初次临床表现时对沙丁胺醇(SABA)或异丙托溴铵(SAMA)的BDR,并探讨与BDR+相关的临床因素。
有症状、未接受过治疗的呼气气流受限患者(n = 105,57名男性,年龄(平均值±标准差):65 ± 10岁)接受了400 mcg沙丁胺醇(第1天)或80 mcg异丙托溴铵(第2天)的BDR测试,并在15分钟和30分钟后测量BDR。通过二项逻辑回归分析评估BDR+风险的临床因素。
我们发现,在使用沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵后15分钟和30分钟时,2005年BDR+患者数量与2021年BDR+患者数量之间具有良好的一致性(88.6 - 94.8%)。使用任何一项标准时,30分钟后显示BDR+的患者均多于15分钟后。当考虑30分钟时的结果时,2005年BDR+患者数量(82%)高于2021年BDR+患者数量(75%),SAMA+患者的比例高于SABA+患者(2005年:70%对49%,Fisher精确检验P < 0.01;2021年:64%对41%,P = 0.001)。对SABA的2005年BDR+和2021年BDR+与预测的BD前第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV)%降低以及咳嗽的存在相关。与SAMA+组相比,SABA+组中哮喘患者更多(2005年:71%对53%,Fischer精确检验P = 0.04;2021年:77%对52%,P = 0.02)。
与2005年的建议相比,根据2021年标准显示BDR+的患者更少,BDR测试方案可能考虑在30分钟后评估对SABA和SAMA的反应。