The Overlooked Risk of Intimate Violation in Research: No Perianal Sampling Without Consent.
作者信息
Gunkel Jasmine
机构信息
National Institutes of Health.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):118-120. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308145. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The Overlooked Risk of Intimate Violation in Research: No Perianal Sampling Without Consent.研究中被忽视的亲密侵犯风险：未经同意不得进行肛周采样。
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):118-120. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308145. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Informed consent for clinical research in the emergency department.急诊科临床研究的知情同意书。
Ann Emerg Med. 1989 Jul;18(7):766-71. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(89)80015-0.
3
Ethical Justifications for Waiving Informed Consent for a Perianal Swab in Critical Burn Care Research.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):110-113. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308133. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
4
Informed patient consent: a historical perspective.患者知情同意：历史视角
Radiol Technol. 1995 Nov-Dec;67(2):119-24.
5
The View of the European Court of Human Rights on Competent Patients’ Right of Informed Consent. Research in the Light of Articles 3 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Eur J Health Law. 2016 Dec;23(5):481-509. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341388.
6
Consent for Intimate Exams on Unconscious Patients: Sharpening Legislative Efforts.同意对无意识患者进行亲密检查：加强立法努力。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jan;52(1):28-31. doi: 10.1002/hast.1337.
7
Informed consent in implantable BCI research: identification of research risks and recommendations for development of best practices.植入式脑机接口研究中的知情同意：研究风险识别与最佳实践发展建议
J Neural Eng. 2016 Aug;13(4):043001. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/4/043001. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Observed behaviors of subjects during informed consent for an emergency department study.受试者在急诊科研究知情同意过程中的观察行为。
Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;55(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.09.023. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
9
Communication and miscommunication in informed consent to research.研究知情同意中的沟通与误沟通
Med Anthropol Q. 2004 Dec;18(4):429-46. doi: 10.1525/maq.2004.18.4.429.
10
A Pot Ignored Boils On: Sustained Calls for Explicit Consent of Intimate Medical Exams.被忽视的问题持续存在：对亲密医学检查明确同意的持续呼吁。
HEC Forum. 2020 Jun;32(2):125-145. doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09399-4.
引用本文的文献
1
The doctor will polygraph you now.医生现在要给你做测谎检查。
Npj Health Syst. 2024;1(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s44401-024-00001-4. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
2
The doctor will polygraph you now: ethical concerns with AI for fact-checking patients.医生现在将对你进行测谎：人工智能用于核实患者情况的伦理问题。
ArXiv. 2024 Nov 11:arXiv:2408.07896v2.
本文引用的文献
1
To Swab or Not to Swab: Waiver of Consent to Collect Perianal Specimens from Incapacitated Patients With Severe Burn Injury.
Am J Bioeth. 2024 Apr;24(4):108-109. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2308155. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
2
Is emergency research without initial consent justified?: the consent substitute model.未经初始同意的紧急研究是否合理？：同意替代模式。
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):668-74. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.80.
3
Pain management.
Burns. 2004 Dec;30(8):A10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.08.004.
Zotero 插件