Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, China.
Psych J. 2024 Oct;13(5):717-725. doi: 10.1002/pchj.748. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
It is important for people to disengage attention from a distraction, which can help them complete the task at hand as quickly as possible. Recent studies have shown that people's attention stays longer on reward-distractors than on loss-distractors, and a delay in attentional disengagement is noted when reward-distractors are present. However, few studies have examined whether attentional disengagement from an evaluative distractor relies upon working memory (WM) components. In the present study, we used an attentional disengagement paradigm in which reward- or loss-distractors were presented at a central location and the target was presented at a peripheral location, in combination with different WM tasks. The results from Experiment 1 showed that participants were slower to disengage their attention from a central reward-distractor than a loss-distractor regardless of cognitive load when the phonological loop component of WM was involved. The results from Experiment 2 revealed that people had difficulty in shifting their attention away from a reward-distractor in comparison to a loss-distractor when spatial WM was low, whereas no such difference was observed when spatial WM was high. We conclude that WM components differently modulate attentional disengagement from evaluative distractors. That is, the processing of evaluative (reward and loss) distractors may rely on the same cognitive resources as the spatial WM component, but not the phonological loop component.
人们需要将注意力从分心物上转移开,这有助于他们尽快完成手头的任务。最近的研究表明,与损失性分心物相比,人们的注意力会在奖赏性分心物上停留更长时间,并且当存在奖赏性分心物时,注意力的转移会延迟。然而,很少有研究探讨从评价性分心物上转移注意力是否依赖于工作记忆(WM)成分。在本研究中,我们使用了一种注意力转移范式,其中奖赏性或损失性分心物出现在中央位置,而目标出现在外周位置,并结合了不同的 WM 任务。实验 1 的结果表明,无论 WM 的语音回路成分的认知负荷如何,参与者从中央奖赏性分心物上转移注意力的速度都比从损失性分心物上转移注意力的速度慢。实验 2 的结果表明,与损失性分心物相比,当空间 WM 较低时,人们很难将注意力从奖赏性分心物上转移开,而当空间 WM 较高时,这种差异并不明显。我们的结论是,WM 成分以不同的方式调节对评价性分心物的注意力转移。也就是说,对评价性(奖赏和损失)分心物的处理可能依赖于与空间 WM 成分相同的认知资源,但不依赖于语音回路成分。