Suppr超能文献

热撕脱氩等离子体凝固术治疗不可圈套息肉:一项多中心随机对照试验

Hot avulsion argon plasma coagulation for the management of the non-ensnarable polyp: A multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Attree Chloe, Ogra Ravinder, Yusoff Ian F, Moss Alan C, Jacques Angela, Brown Gregor, Alexander Sina, Efthymiou Marios, Raftopoulos Spiro

机构信息

Gastroenterology Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital Nedlands Western Australia Australia.

Gastroenterology Middlemore Hospital Auckland New Zealand.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2024 Mar 26;8(3):e13052. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.13052. eCollection 2024 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Snare resection of nonlifting colonic lesions often requires supplemental techniques. We compared the success rates of neoplasia eradication using hot avulsion and argon plasma coagulation in colonic polyps when complete snare polypectomy had failed.

METHODS

Polyps that were not completely resectable by snare polypectomy were randomized to argon plasma coagulation or hot avulsion for completion of resection. Argon plasma coagulation was delivered using a forward shooting catheter, using a nontouch technique (flow 1.2 L, 35 watts). Hot avulsion was performed by grasping the neoplastic tissue with hot biopsy forceps and applying traction away from the bowel wall while using EndoCut I or soft coagulation for avulsion. Surveillance colonoscopies were performed at 6, 12, and 18 months.

RESULTS

From November 2013 to July 2017, 59 patients were randomized to argon plasma coagulation (28) or hot avulsion (31). The median age was 69 (60-75), with 46% being female. The median residual tissue size was 10 mm (6-12). The residual adenoma rate at 6 months (hot avulsion 6% argon plasma coagulation 21%  = 0.09) and 18 months was not different between the groups (6.6% 3.6%  = 0.25). One patient in the argon plasma coagulation arm was diagnosed with metastatic cancer of likely colorectal origin despite benign histology in the original polypectomy specimen, supporting the importance of tissue acquisition.

CONCLUSION

Both hot avulsion and argon plasma coagulation are effective and safe modalities to complete resection of non-ensnarable colonic polyps.

摘要

背景与目的

圈套切除无法提起的结肠病变通常需要辅助技术。我们比较了在结肠息肉圈套息肉切除术失败时,使用热活检钳摘除术和氩离子凝固术根除肿瘤的成功率。

方法

无法通过圈套息肉切除术完全切除的息肉被随机分为氩离子凝固术组或热活检钳摘除术组以完成切除。氩离子凝固术使用前射导管,采用非接触技术(流量1.2升,35瓦)。热活检钳摘除术是用热活检钳抓住肿瘤组织,在使用EndoCut I或软凝模式进行撕脱时,向远离肠壁的方向施加牵引力。分别在6、12和18个月时进行结肠镜监测。

结果

2013年11月至2017年7月,59例患者被随机分为氩离子凝固术组(28例)或热活检钳摘除术组(31例)。中位年龄为69岁(60 - 75岁),女性占46%。中位残留组织大小为10毫米(6 - 12毫米)。两组在6个月时的残留腺瘤率(热活检钳摘除术组6%,氩离子凝固术组21%,P = 0.09)和18个月时并无差异(6.6%对3.6%,P = 0.25)。氩离子凝固术组有1例患者尽管最初息肉切除标本的组织学检查为良性,但仍被诊断为可能起源于结直肠的转移性癌,这支持了获取组织的重要性。

结论

热活检钳摘除术和氩离子凝固术都是完成不可圈套结肠息肉切除的有效且安全的方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cad/10964916/ef6a021436e4/JGH3-8-e13052-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验