Harper Diane M, Yu Tiffany M, Fendrick A Mark
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Department of Family Medicine, the Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, and the Center for Value-Based Design, University of Michigan, and the Department of Women's and Gender Studies, University of Michigan College of Literature, Science and the Arts, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Guidehouse, Inc, San Francisco, California.
O G Open. 2024 Mar 19;1(1):e001. doi: 10.1097/og9.0000000000000001. eCollection 2024 Mar.
To model the potential number of cancers prevented and life-years saved over a range of adherence rates to cervical cancer screening, surveillance follow-up, and follow-up colposcopy that may result from removing financial barriers to these essential clinical services.
A previously validated decision-analytic Markov microsimulation model was used to evaluate the increase in adherence to screening, surveillance, and colposcopy after an abnormal cervical cancer screening result. For each incremental increase in adherence, we modeled the number of cervical cancer cases avoided, the stages at which the cancers were detected, the number of cervical cancer deaths avoided, and the number of life-years gained.
Compared with current adherence rates, the model estimated that an optimized scenario of perfect screening, surveillance, and colposcopy adherence per 100,000 women currently eligible for screening in the United States was 128 (95% CI, 66-199) fewer cervical cancers detected (23%), 62 (95% CI, 7-120) fewer cervical cancer deaths (20%), and 2,135 (95% CI, 1,363-3,057) more life-years saved. Sensitivity analysis revealed that any increase in adherence led to clinically meaningful health benefits.
The consequences of not attending routine screening or follow-up after an abnormal cervical cancer screening result are associated with preventable cervical cancer morbidity and premature mortality. Given the potential for the removal of consumer cost sharing to increase the use of necessary follow-up after abnormal screening results and to ultimately reduce cervical cancer morbidity and mortality, public and private payers should remove cost barriers to these essential services.
构建一个模型,以估算通过消除宫颈癌筛查、监测随访及后续阴道镜检查等基本临床服务的经济障碍,可能实现的癌症预防数量及挽救的生命年数,该估算基于一系列不同的依从率。
采用一个先前经过验证的决策分析马尔可夫微观模拟模型,来评估宫颈癌筛查结果异常后,筛查、监测及阴道镜检查依从性的提高情况。对于依从性的每一次增量提高,我们模拟了避免的宫颈癌病例数、癌症检测阶段、避免的宫颈癌死亡数以及获得的生命年数。
与当前的依从率相比,该模型估计,在美国目前符合筛查条件的每10万名女性中,若实现完美的筛查、监测及阴道镜检查依从性这一优化方案,可减少128例(95%可信区间,66 - 199)宫颈癌检测病例(减少23%),减少62例(95%可信区间,7 - 120)宫颈癌死亡(减少20%),并多挽救2135个(95%可信区间,1363 - 3057)生命年。敏感性分析表明,依从性的任何提高都能带来具有临床意义的健康益处。
宫颈癌筛查结果异常后不进行常规筛查或随访,会导致可预防的宫颈癌发病和过早死亡。鉴于消除消费者成本分担有可能增加异常筛查结果后必要随访的利用率,并最终降低宫颈癌的发病率和死亡率,公共和私人支付方应消除这些基本服务的成本障碍。