Suppr超能文献

运动干预对急性内科病房患者身体和健康结果的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of exercise intervention on physical and health outcomes in patients admitted to an acute medical ward: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.

Holsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2024 Jul;38(7):884-897. doi: 10.1177/02692155241240637. Epub 2024 Mar 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of inpatient medical ward exercise on physical and health outcomes in adults compared with usual care.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched from inception to 20 April 2023.

REVIEW METHODS

Randomised-controlled trials in English that reported physical and health outcomes of adults who received an exercise intervention on an acute medical ward were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro and TESTEX scales. The GRADE rating assessed the quality of evidence to evaluate the certainty of effect. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included, with 1273 unique participants (mean [SD] age, 75.5 [11] years), which compared exercise intervention with usual care. Low quality evidence demonstrated a significant improvement in aerobic capacity ([MD], 1.39 m [95% CI, 0.23, 2.55], p = 0.02) and maximum isometric strength ([MD], 2.3 kg [95% CI, 2.2, 2.4], p < 0.001) for the exercise intervention compared with usual care. Low quality evidence demonstrated no difference for in-hospital falls count ([OR], 1.93 [95% CI, 0.61, 6.12] p = 0.27) or mortality ([OR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.48, 1.23], p = 0.27). Moderate quality evidence demonstrated no difference for length of stay ([MD], -0.10 days [95% CI, -0.31, 0.11] p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

Exercise prescribed during an acute medical ward stay improves aerobic capacity and maximum isometric strength but may not reduce length of stay, in-hospital falls or mortality.

摘要

目的

评估与常规护理相比,住院内科病房运动对成年人身体和健康结果的有效性。

资料来源

从建库到 2023 年 4 月 20 日,检索了 Medline、CINAHL 和 EMBASE。

综述方法

纳入了以英语发表的、报告接受急性内科病房运动干预的成年人身体和健康结果的随机对照试验。两名审查员独立提取数据。使用 PEDro 和 TESTEX 量表评估方法学质量。GRADE 评级评估证据质量以评估效果的确定性。在可能的情况下进行了荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 13 项研究,共有 1273 名独特的参与者(平均[SD]年龄,75.5[11]岁),比较了运动干预与常规护理。低质量证据表明,与常规护理相比,运动干预可显著改善有氧运动能力[MD,1.39 m(95%CI,0.23,2.55),p=0.02]和最大等长力量[MD,2.3 kg(95%CI,2.2,2.4),p<0.001]。低质量证据表明,运动干预与常规护理相比,院内跌倒次数[OR,1.93(95%CI,0.61,6.12),p=0.27]或死亡率[OR,0.77(95%CI,0.48,1.23),p=0.27]无差异。中等质量证据表明,运动干预与常规护理相比,住院时间[MD,-0.10 天(95%CI,-0.31,0.11),p=0.36]无差异。

结论

在急性内科病房住院期间进行的运动可提高有氧运动能力和最大等长力量,但可能不会减少住院时间、院内跌倒或死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e96f/11118790/f136e6712882/10.1177_02692155241240637-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验