• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国的牙科诊所网站——它们如何介绍氟化物防龋?

Dental Practice Websites in Germany-How Do They Inform about Fluoridation?

作者信息

Geiken Antje, Kock Mirja, Banz Lisa, Schwendicke Falk, Graetz Christian

机构信息

Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University of Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Clinic for Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital of Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Dent J (Basel). 2024 Mar 4;12(3):65. doi: 10.3390/dj12030065.

DOI:10.3390/dj12030065
PMID:38534289
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10968803/
Abstract

Fluoridation (Fl) is effective in preventing caries; however, it is unclear to what extent its use is counteracted by misinformation on the internet. This study aimed to evaluate the information provided on professional websites of German dental practices regarding fluoridation. A systematic search was performed by two independent examiners, utilizing three search engines, from 10 September 2021 to 11 December 2021. Modified, validated questionnaires (LIDA, DISCERN) were used to evaluate technical and functional aspects, generic quality, and risk of bias. Demographic information and statements about Fl were also collected. The intra- and inter-rater reliability assessments were excellent. Of the 81 websites analyzed, 64 (79%) mentioned Fl, and 31 (38%) indicated it as a primary focus. Most websites met at least 50% of the LIDA (90%) and DISCERN criteria (99%), indicating that the general quality was good. Thirty (37%) of the websites explained the impact of Fl, and forty-five (56%) indicated an opinion (for/against) on Fl. The practice location and the clinical focus were not associated with the overall quality of websites. Only a minority of websites explained the effects of Fl. Taken together, this study highlights that there is a distinct lack of good-quality information on FL.

摘要

氟化作用(Fl)在预防龋齿方面是有效的;然而,互联网上的错误信息在多大程度上抵消了其使用效果尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估德国牙科诊所专业网站上提供的有关氟化作用的信息。2021年9月10日至2021年12月11日,两名独立审查员利用三个搜索引擎进行了系统检索。使用经过修改和验证的问卷(LIDA、DISCERN)来评估技术和功能方面、一般质量以及偏倚风险。还收集了人口统计学信息和关于氟化作用的陈述。评分者内和评分者间的可靠性评估都非常出色。在分析的81个网站中,64个(79%)提到了氟化作用,31个(38%)将其作为主要关注点。大多数网站至少满足LIDA标准(90%)和DISCERN标准(99%)的50%,表明总体质量良好。30个(37%)网站解释了氟化作用的影响,45个(56%)表明了对氟化作用的看法(支持/反对)。诊所位置和临床重点与网站的整体质量无关。只有少数网站解释了氟化作用的效果。综上所述,本研究强调关于氟化作用的高质量信息明显缺乏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7840/10968803/2a04c1810789/dentistry-12-00065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7840/10968803/2a04c1810789/dentistry-12-00065-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7840/10968803/2a04c1810789/dentistry-12-00065-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dental Practice Websites in Germany-How Do They Inform about Fluoridation?德国的牙科诊所网站——它们如何介绍氟化物防龋?
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Mar 4;12(3):65. doi: 10.3390/dj12030065.
2
Does information about MIH on dental homepages in Germany offer high quality? A systematic search and analysis.德国牙科主页上关于 MIH 的信息提供的质量如何?系统搜索和分析。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Feb;25(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00857-4. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Quality of Patient-Centered eHealth Information on Erosive Tooth Wear: Systematic Search and Evaluation of Websites and YouTube Videos.基于患者为中心的网站和 YouTube 视频中关于牙酸蚀症的电子健康信息质量:系统检索和评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 31;26:e49514. doi: 10.2196/49514.
4
German dentists' websites on periodontitis have low quality of information.德国牙医牙周炎相关网站的信息质量较差。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Aug 2;17(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0511-8.
5
Quality of Information Regarding Repair Restorations on Dentist Websites: Systematic Search and Analysis.牙医网站上关于修复体修复的信息质量:系统检索与分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 15;22(4):e17250. doi: 10.2196/17250.
6
The design and content of orthodontic practise websites in the UK is suboptimal and does not correlate with search ranking.英国正畸实践网站的设计和内容并不理想,且与搜索排名无关。
Eur J Orthod. 2015 Aug;37(4):447-52. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cju078. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
7
Evaluation of English Websites on Dental Caries by Using Consumer Evaluation Tools.使用消费者评估工具对龋齿相关英文网站的评估
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2016;14(4):363-9. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a35746.
8
Evaluating the Dental Caries-Related Information on Brazilian Websites: Qualitative Study.评估巴西网站上与龋齿相关的信息:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 13;19(12):e415. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7681.
9
Adult orthodontics: a quality assessment of Internet information.成人正畸:互联网信息的质量评估
J Orthod. 2016 Sep;43(3):186-92. doi: 10.1080/14653125.2016.1194599. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
The quality and reliability of the Internet as a source of information for hypodontia patients.互联网作为缺牙症患者信息来源的质量和可靠性。
J Orthod. 2023 Sep;50(3):268-275. doi: 10.1177/14653125221145705. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Early prevention from the first tooth - what do German dental homepages recommend?从第一颗牙齿开始早期预防——德国牙科网站推荐了什么?
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1028. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06406-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The fluorosis conundrum: bridging the gap between science and public health.氟中毒难题:弥合科学与公共卫生之间的差距。
Toxicol Mech Methods. 2024 Feb;34(2):214-235. doi: 10.1080/15376516.2023.2268722. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
2
The Impact of Social Media on Vaccination: A Narrative Review.社交媒体对疫苗接种的影响:叙事性综述。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Oct 16;38(40):e326. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e326.
3
Analysis of Fluoride-Free Content on Twitter: Topic Modeling Study.分析推特上不含氟化物的内容:主题建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 20;25:e44586. doi: 10.2196/44586.
4
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review.社交媒体中的假新闻、虚假信息与错误信息:综述
Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Association between Level of Parental Oral Health Literacy and the Rational Use of Fluoride for Children from 0 to 4 Years of Age after Instruction: An Intervention Trial.父母口腔健康素养水平与儿童口腔健康的关系:一项干预试验 0 至 4 岁儿童在接受指导后合理使用氟化物
Caries Res. 2022;56(5-6):535-545. doi: 10.1159/000527419. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
6
Risk Communication in Public Health: Lessons from a Historic Fluoridation Debate in Saskatchewan.公共卫生中的风险沟通:来自萨斯喀彻温省一场历史性的氟化物添加辩论的教训
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(14):3124-3134. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2137771. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
7
Fluoride hesitancy: A mixed methods study on decision-making about forms of fluoride.氟化物犹豫:关于氟化物形式决策的混合方法研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Oct;51(5):997-1008. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12800. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
8
Attitude of Midwives towards Fluoride Recommendations and Oral Prevention in Infants and Young Children.助产士对婴幼儿氟化物建议及口腔预防的态度。
Children (Basel). 2022 Jul 29;9(8):1135. doi: 10.3390/children9081135.
9
Characterization of False or Misleading Fluoride Content on Instagram: Infodemiology Study.Instagram 上虚假或误导性氟化物含量的特征:信息流行病学研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 19;24(5):e37519. doi: 10.2196/37519.
10
Mothers' Sources of Child Fluoride Information and Misinformation From Social Connections.母亲获取儿童氟化物信息的来源及社会联系中的错误信息。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e226414. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6414.