• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使士兵能够从以目标为导向的领导中受益:非歧视性领导行为和工作团队凝聚力的调节作用。

Equipping soldiers to benefit from goal-focused leadership: The moderating effects of non-discriminatory leader behaviors and workgroup cohesion.

作者信息

Perry Sara Jansen, Johnson Lars U, Witt L A, McDonald Daniel P

机构信息

Hankamer School of Business Department of Management, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Mil Psychol. 2021 Aug 20;33(5):341-355. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1962182. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1080/08995605.2021.1962182
PMID:38536286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10013348/
Abstract

We apply the Job Demands-Resources model to explicate how two contextual factors (nondiscriminatory leadership behavior and cohesion) may equip subordinates to benefit from the leadership style of goal-focused leadership (GFL), a predominant leadership style in the military context. We predict that only when GFL is delivered in conjunction with nondiscriminatory leadership behaviors in a cohesive workgroup (which, we theorize, combine to create a resource-rich environment), subordinates may experience the lowest levels of exhaustion. We tested our hypothesis in two independent samples of uniformed United States Department of Defense personnel deployed in non-combat zones, and results are fully supportive. We add to recent efforts to expand the nomological network of GFL, pinpointing situational factors that may equip subordinates to experience lower (rather than higher) exhaustion when working with a goal-focused leader. In doing so, we also contribute to theory on diversity and stress, and we suggest practical applications for leadership across a range of hierarchical contexts, including the military and other large organizations. In all, our work may help inform the proper balance of leadership and workgroup factors, which determine the optimal context in which individuals can be equipped to benefit from GFL.

摘要

我们运用工作要求-资源模型来阐释两个情境因素(非歧视性领导行为和凝聚力)如何使下属从目标导向型领导(GFL)这种军事背景下的主要领导风格中受益。我们预测,只有当GFL与非歧视性领导行为在一个具有凝聚力的工作团队中结合时(我们理论上认为,二者结合会创造一个资源丰富的环境),下属才可能体验到最低程度的疲惫。我们在美国国防部部署在非战区的两个独立的穿制服人员样本中检验了我们的假设,结果完全支持我们的假设。我们为最近扩展GFL理论网络的努力做出了贡献,指出了一些情境因素,这些因素可能使下属在与目标导向型领导共事时体验到较低(而非较高)程度的疲惫。在此过程中,我们也为多样性与压力理论做出了贡献,并提出了在包括军队和其他大型组织在内的一系列层级背景下的领导力实际应用建议。总之,我们的研究可能有助于明确领导因素和工作团队因素的恰当平衡,而这种平衡决定了个体能够从GFL中受益的最佳情境。

相似文献

1
Equipping soldiers to benefit from goal-focused leadership: The moderating effects of non-discriminatory leader behaviors and workgroup cohesion.使士兵能够从以目标为导向的领导中受益:非歧视性领导行为和工作团队凝聚力的调节作用。
Mil Psychol. 2021 Aug 20;33(5):341-355. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1962182. eCollection 2021.
2
The downside of goal-focused leadership: the role of personality in subordinate exhaustion.目标导向型领导的弊端:人格在下属精疲力竭中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1145-53. doi: 10.1037/a0020538.
3
Military suicide prevention: The importance of leadership behaviors as an upstream suicide prevention target.军事自杀预防:领导行为作为上游自杀预防目标的重要性。
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2021 Apr;51(2):316-324. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12707.
4
Situational moderators of leader reward and punishment behaviors: fact or fiction?领导者奖惩行为的情境调节因素:事实还是虚构?
Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1984 Aug;34(1):21-63. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90036-9.
5
Is the health-awareness of leaders related to the working conditions, engagement, and exhaustion in their teams? A multi-level mediation study.领导者的健康意识是否与其团队的工作条件、投入度和疲惫感有关?一项多层次中介研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 24;21(1):1935. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11985-1.
6
Authentic Leadership, Trust (in the Leader), and Flourishing: Does Precariousness Matter?真实领导力、对领导者的信任与蓬勃发展:不稳定性重要吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 1;13:798759. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.798759. eCollection 2022.
7
The Influence of Authoritarian-Benevolent Leadership on Subordinates' Work Engagement: A Social Information Processing Perspective.专制-仁慈型领导对下属工作投入的影响:社会信息加工视角
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Sep 13;16:3805-3819. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S422961. eCollection 2023.
8
"What you see depends on where you stand" exploring the relationship between leadership behavior and job type in health care.“你所看到的取决于你所处的位置”——探索医疗保健领域领导行为与工作类型之间的关系。
Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;14:35-65. doi: 10.1108/s1474-8231(2013)0000014007.
9
Leader Extraversion as a Boundary Condition in the Relationship between Transformational Leadership, Vitality, and Job Improvement.领导外倾性在变革型领导、活力与工作改进关系中的边界条件。
Span J Psychol. 2022 Mar 9;25:e11. doi: 10.1017/SJP.2022.8.
10
Leader Humility, and Subordinates' Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Withdrawal Behavior: Exploring the Mediating Mechanisms of Subordinates' Psychological Capital.领导者谦逊与下属组织公民行为和退出行为:探究下属心理资本的中介机制。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 8;17(7):2544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072544.

引用本文的文献

1
Securing success: Exploring attachment dynamics and psychological safety for adaptive behaviors in a military context.确保成功:探索军事背景下适应性行为的依恋动态和心理安全。
Mil Psychol. 2025;37(4):269-279. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2356497. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Respectful leadership: Reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity.尊重型领导:减少领导者角色不一致和性别差异带来的绩效挑战。
Hum Relat. 2018 Dec;71(12):1590-1610. doi: 10.1177/0018726718754992. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
2
Accumulative job demands and support for strength use: Fine-tuning the job demands-resources model using conservation of resources theory.累积工作需求与力量运用支持:运用资源保存理论对工作需求-资源模型进行精细化调整。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jan;101(1):141-50. doi: 10.1037/apl0000033. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
3
Time pressure and coworker support mediate the curvilinear relationship between age and occupational well-being.时间压力和同事支持调节了年龄与职业幸福感之间的曲线关系。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;19(4):462-75. doi: 10.1037/a0036995. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
4
Stress in highly demanding IT jobs: transformational leadership moderates the impact of time pressure on exhaustion and work-life balance.高要求 IT 工作中的压力:变革型领导调节时间压力对疲惫和工作生活平衡的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2013 Jul;18(3):252-261. doi: 10.1037/a0033085.
5
Psychometric properties of the mini-IPIP in a large, nationally representative sample of young adults.大样本青年群体中迷你 IPIP 的心理测量特性。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(1):74-84. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.700466. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
6
Empowering leaders optimize working conditions for engagement: a multilevel study.赋能领导者优化参与工作条件:一项多层次研究。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):15-27. doi: 10.1037/a0025942.
7
Perceived unfairness and employee health: a meta-analytic integration.感知不公平与员工健康:元分析整合。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Mar;97(2):235-72. doi: 10.1037/a0025408. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
8
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
9
The downside of goal-focused leadership: the role of personality in subordinate exhaustion.目标导向型领导的弊端:人格在下属精疲力竭中的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1145-53. doi: 10.1037/a0020538.
10
A multilevel model of the effects of equal opportunity climate on job satisfaction in the military.多层次模型:平等机会氛围对军队工作满意度的影响。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2010 Apr;15(2):191-207. doi: 10.1037/a0018756.