Alzate Vanegas Juan Manuel, Wine William, Drasgow Fritz
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
United States Marine Corps, Arlington, Virginia, USA.
Mil Psychol. 2021 Nov 19;34(2):147-166. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.1978754. eCollection 2022.
The present study compared the performance of logistic regression models with that of machine learning classification models (classification trees and random forests) in the context of predicting training attrition from the Delayed Enlistment Program in the United States Marine Corps (USMC) with scores from the Tailored Adaptive Personality Assessment System (TAPAS). Performance was assessed according to the type of misclassification error and across a variety of different reasons for attrition. The base rate of attrition was low, which impeded the training process, but the machine learning models outperformed logistic regression in predicting voluntary attrition in a stratified 50% attrition sample.
本研究在美国海军陆战队(USMC)延迟入伍计划中,使用量身定制的适应性人格评估系统(TAPAS)的分数,比较了逻辑回归模型与机器学习分类模型(分类树和随机森林)在预测训练流失方面的表现。根据错误分类误差的类型以及各种不同的流失原因对表现进行了评估。流失的基础比率较低,这阻碍了训练进程,但在一个分层的50%流失样本中,机器学习模型在预测自愿流失方面优于逻辑回归。