Darr Wendy, Fors Brandebo Maria, Zajícová Markéta, Verboom Marjolein, Kai Nyman, Wolgers Gerhard
Director General Military Personnel Research & Analysis, Department of National Defence, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Leadership and Command & Control, Swedish Defence University, Karlstaad, Sweden.
Mil Psychol. 2022 Mar 1;34(5):591-603. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2021.2024113. eCollection 2022.
Personnel selection research has seen an increasing interest in integrity tests. Although these tests have been found to predict a variety of workplace criteria, a long-standing criticism of integrity tests is their criterion-focussed nature. A construct-oriented approach to integrity test development involves identifying important elements of integrity and developing content to reflect those elements. Drawing upon earlier attempts to define integrity, this paper conceptualizes integrity as a behavior, and elaborates on two definitional elements, nature of standards and their referent. Undertaking a content analysis of the high-level codes of conduct of 13 military nations, this paper illustrates the application of an approach to defining integrity for use in the military context. It includes a discussion on the operationalization of integrity for assessment purposes, highlighting considerations that must be given to all aspects of the assessment development process.
人员选拔研究对诚信测试的兴趣日益浓厚。尽管这些测试已被证明能预测各种工作场所标准,但对诚信测试长期存在的批评是其以标准为导向的性质。一种面向结构的诚信测试开发方法包括确定诚信的重要要素,并开发反映这些要素的内容。借鉴早期对诚信的定义尝试,本文将诚信概念化为一种行为,并详细阐述了两个定义要素,即标准的性质及其参照对象。通过对13个军事国家的高级行为准则进行内容分析,本文阐述了一种在军事背景下定义诚信以供使用的方法的应用。它包括关于为评估目的而对诚信进行操作化的讨论,强调了在评估开发过程的各个方面必须考虑的因素。