Xuan Qi, Lyu Zhe, Chen Qingsong, Chen Jie, Yang Huan, Wang Yaohui, Zhang Chongyang
Department of Emergency, the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China.
Key Laboratory of Marine Emergency Medicine of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao 066000, Hebei, China. Corresponding author: Wang Yaohui, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2024 Mar;36(3):256-259. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20231225-01109.
To investigate the therapeutic effect of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) on patients with pulmonary edema caused by seawater drowning.
A retrospective analysis method was used. Based on the Utstein database of emergency drowning in the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, the clinical data of patients with seawater drowning pulmonary edema admitted to the emergency medicine department of the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2022 were collected. The patients were divided into NPPV group and HFNC group according to different ventilation methods. The general data, endotracheal intubation rate in 7 days, arterial blood gas analysis indexes [arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO), arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO)] and hemodynamic indexes (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, blood lactic acid) before and after treatment, length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU), oxygen therapy comfort of the two groups were compared.
A total of 54 patients were enrolled, including 21 patients in the NPPV group and 33 patients in the HFNC group. There were no significant differences in gender, age, state of consciousness and other general information between the two groups. Compared with NPPV group, the rate of endotracheal intubation in HFNC group within 7 days was significantly lower [24.2% (8/33) vs. 33.3% (7/21), P < 0.05]. Before treatment, there were no significant differences in arterial blood gas analysis and hemodynamics between the two groups. After treatment, the above indexes in both groups were significantly improved compared with those before treatment, and PaO, SaO, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in HFNC group were significantly higher than those in NPPV group [PaO (mmHg, 1 mmHg≈0.133kPa): 93.56±6.37 vs. 82.14±6.25, SaO: 1.02±0.09 vs. 0.95±0.11, systolic blood pressure (mmHg): 117.37±8.43 vs. 110.42±8.38, diastolic blood pressure (mmHg): 79.43±7.61 vs. 72.21±4.32, mean arterial pressure (mmHg): 92.34±6.32 vs. 85.12±5.38], PaCO, heart rate and blood lactic acid were significantly lower than those in NPPV group [PaCO (mmHg) : 34.26±5.63 vs. 37.24±6.22, heart rate (times/min): 73.38±7.56 vs. 86.25±5.41, blood lactic acid (mmol/L): 1.38±0.36 vs. 2.25±1.14], and the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.05). In addition, the length of ICU stay in HFNC group was significantly shorter than that in NPPV group (days: 13.30±2.38 vs. 16.27±4.26), and the comfort rate of oxygen therapy was significantly higher than that in NPPV group [66.7% (22/33) vs. 42.8% (9/21)], with statistical significance (all P < 0.05).
HFNC can improve the oxygenation of patients with pulmonary edema caused by seawater drowning, improve hemodynamics, reduce the rate of tracheal intubation, shorten the length of ICU stay, and improve the comfort of oxygen therapy, which has certain clinical application value.
探讨高流量鼻导管吸氧疗法(HFNC)与无创正压通气(NPPV)对海水淹溺致肺水肿患者的治疗效果。
采用回顾性分析方法。基于秦皇岛市第一医院急诊淹溺的Utstein数据库,收集2019年1月1日至2022年12月31日在秦皇岛市第一医院急诊科住院的海水淹溺肺水肿患者的临床资料。根据不同通气方式将患者分为NPPV组和HFNC组。比较两组的一般资料、7天内气管插管率、动脉血气分析指标[动脉血氧分压(PaO)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)]及治疗前后的血流动力学指标(收缩压、舒张压、平均动脉压、心率、血乳酸)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、氧疗舒适度。
共纳入54例患者,其中NPPV组21例,HFNC组33例。两组在性别、年龄、意识状态等一般资料方面差异无统计学意义。与NPPV组比较,HFNC组7天内气管插管率明显降低[24.2%(8/33)比33.3%(7/21),P<0.05]。治疗前,两组动脉血气分析及血流动力学指标差异无统计学意义。治疗后,两组上述指标均较治疗前明显改善,且HFNC组的PaO、SaO、收缩压、舒张压及平均动脉压均明显高于NPPV组[PaO(mmHg,1mmHg≈0.133kPa):93.56±6.37比82.14±6.25,SaO:1.02±0.09比0.95±0.11,收缩压(mmHg):117.37±8.43比110.42±8.38,舒张压(mmHg):79.43±7.61比72.21±4.32,平均动脉压(mmHg):92.34±6.32比85.12±5.38],PaCO、心率及血乳酸均明显低于NPPV组[PaCO(mmHg):34.26±5.63比37.24±6.22,心率(次/分):73.38±7.56比86.25±5.41,血乳酸(mmol/L):1.38±0.36比2.25±1.14],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。此外,HFNC组ICU住院时间明显短于NPPV组(天:13.30±2.38比16.27±4.26),氧疗舒适度明显高于NPPV组[66.7%(22/33)比42.8%(9/21)],差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。
HFNC可改善海水淹溺致肺水肿患者的氧合,改善血流动力学,降低气管插管率,缩短ICU住院时间,提高氧疗舒适度,具有一定的临床应用价值。