Suppr超能文献

基于 MRI 的前列腺活检决策策略中,使用区域特异性前列腺特异性抗原密度降低假阳性率。

Reduction of false positives using zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density for prostate MRI-based biopsy decision strategies.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2024 Oct;34(10):6229-6240. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10700-z. Epub 2024 Mar 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density (sPSAD) combined with PI-RADS to guide prostate biopsy decision strategies (BDS).

METHODS

This retrospective study included consecutive patients, who underwent prostate MRI and biopsy (01/2012-10/2018). The whole gland and transition zone (TZ) were segmented at MRI using a retrained deep learning system (DLS; nnU-Net) to calculate PSAD and sPSAD, respectively. Additionally, sPSAD and PI-RADS were combined in a BDS, and diagnostic performances to detect Grade Group ≥ 2 (GG ≥ 2) prostate cancer were compared. Patient-based cancer detection using sPSAD was assessed by bootstrapping with 1000 repetitions and reported as area under the curve (AUC). Clinical utility of the BDS was tested in the hold-out test set using decision curve analysis. Statistics included nonparametric DeLong test for AUCs and Fisher-Yates test for remaining performance metrics.

RESULTS

A total of 1604 patients aged 67 (interquartile range, 61-73) with 48% GG ≥ 2 prevalence (774/1604) were evaluated. By employing DLS-based prostate and TZ volumes (DICE coefficients of 0.89 (95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.97) and 0.84 (0.70-0.99)), GG ≥ 2 detection using PSAD was inferior to sPSAD (AUC, 0.71 (0.68-0.74)/0.73 (0.70-0.76); p < 0.001). Combining PI-RADS with sPSAD, GG ≥ 2 detection specificity doubled from 18% (10-20%) to 43% (30-44%; p < 0.001) with similar sensitivity (93% (89-96%)/97% (94-99%); p = 0.052), when biopsies were taken in PI-RADS 4-5 and 3 only if sPSAD was ≥ 0.42 ng/mL/cc as compared to all PI-RADS 3-5 cases. Additionally, using the sPSAD-based BDS, false positives were reduced by 25% (123 (104-142)/165 (146-185); p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using sPSAD to guide biopsy decisions in PI-RADS 3 lesions can reduce false positives at MRI while maintaining high sensitivity for GG ≥ 2 cancers.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Transition zone-specific prostate-specific antigen density can improve the accuracy of prostate cancer detection compared to MRI assessments alone, by lowering false-positive cases without significantly missing men with ISUP GG ≥ 2 cancers.

KEY POINTS

• Prostate biopsy decision strategies using PI-RADS at MRI are limited by a substantial proportion of false positives, not yielding grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer. • PI-RADS combined with transition zone (TZ)-specific prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) decreased the number of unproductive biopsies by 25% compared to PI-RADS only. • TZ-specific PSAD also improved the specificity of MRI-directed biopsies by 9% compared to the whole gland PSAD, while showing identical sensitivity.

摘要

目的

开发并测试特定区域前列腺特异性抗原密度(sPSAD)与 PI-RADS 相结合的方法,以指导前列腺活检决策策略(BDS)。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入了连续接受前列腺 MRI 和活检的患者(01/2012-10/2018)。使用经过重新训练的深度学习系统(nnU-Net)在 MRI 上对整个腺体和移行区(TZ)进行分段,以分别计算 PSAD 和 sPSAD。此外,将 sPSAD 与 PI-RADS 相结合,并比较了其用于检测 GG≥2(GG≥2)前列腺癌的诊断性能。通过 1000 次重复的自举法评估 sPSAD 用于患者检测的曲线下面积(AUC)。使用决策曲线分析在保留的测试集中测试 BDS 的临床实用性。统计方法包括 AUC 的非参数 DeLong 检验和剩余性能指标的 Fisher-Yates 检验。

结果

共评估了 1604 例年龄为 67 岁(四分位间距,61-73)、GG≥2 患病率为 48%(774/1604)的患者。通过使用基于 DLS 的前列腺和 TZ 体积(DICE 系数为 0.89(95%置信区间,0.80-0.97)和 0.84(0.70-0.99)),PSAD 检测 GG≥2 的性能不如 sPSAD(AUC,0.71(0.68-0.74)/0.73(0.70-0.76);p<0.001)。将 PI-RADS 与 sPSAD 相结合,将活检仅限于 PI-RADS 4-5 和 3 且 sPSAD≥0.42 ng/mL/cc 时,特异性从 18%(10-20%)提高到 43%(30-44%;p<0.001),而敏感性保持不变(93%(89-96%)/97%(94-99%);p=0.052),与所有 PI-RADS 3-5 病例相比。此外,与基于 sPSAD 的 BDS 相比,假阳性减少了 25%(123(104-142)/165(146-185);p<0.001)。

结论

在 PI-RADS 3 病变中使用 sPSAD 指导活检决策,可以降低 MRI 检查的假阳性率,同时保持对 GG≥2 癌症的高敏感性。

临床相关性声明

与单独使用 MRI 评估相比,移行区特异性前列腺特异性抗原密度(sPSAD)可以通过降低假阳性病例来提高前列腺癌检测的准确性,而不会明显遗漏 ISUP GG≥2 癌症的患者。

关键点

  1. 基于 MRI 的 PI-RADS 的前列腺活检决策策略受到大量假阳性的限制,未能发现 GG≥2 前列腺癌。

  2. 与仅使用 PI-RADS 相比,PI-RADS 联合 TZ 特异性前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)可将无意义的活检数量减少 25%。

  3. 与全腺体 PSAD 相比,TZ 特异性 PSAD 还将 MRI 引导活检的特异性提高了 9%,同时保持了相同的敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb75/11399225/45e5c7d9d7cd/330_2024_10700_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验