Breast Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
University of Catania, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Catania, Italy; Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Catania, Italy.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;50(12):108732. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108732. Epub 2024 Oct 2.
Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) should increase the rate of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) patients, especially in those achieving tumor shrinkage. Still, the conversion from a pre-planned mastectomy to BCS in patients responding to NAT is not a widespread standard. We aimed to identify factors influencing surgical choices in this setting.
We retrospectively collected data of BC patients with complete remission of primitive tumor (ypT0) after NAT, treated with BCS or mastectomy in two Italian breast units. Predictors of mastectomy were explored using logistic regression. Distant recurrence and event-free survival were assessed in the BCS and mastectomy cohort.
243 patients were included, 147 (60.5 %) treated with BCS and 96 (39.5 %) treated with mastectomy. In the mastectomy group, there were more centrally-located, multiple and larger tumors. At univariate regression analysis, central location, baseline tumor extension on ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multiple foci and clinical stage were significantly associated with the chance of receiving mastectomy. At multivariate analysis, only baseline focality on US and extension on MRI retained significance as predictors of mastectomy. Distant recurrence and event-free survival were significantly longer in patients undergoing BCS.
Baseline tumor extension and focality were the main predictors of mastectomy in patients with ypT0 after NAT. However, BCS did not negatively affect survival outcomes in our cohort. An effort should be made to avoid potentially unnecessary mastectomy in this population, aiming at minimizing surgery-associated toxicities and improving patients' quality of life.
新辅助治疗(NAT)应提高非转移性乳腺癌(BC)患者保乳手术(BCS)的比率,尤其是在肿瘤缩小的患者中。然而,在对 NAT 有反应的患者中,从计划中的乳房切除术转为 BCS 并不是普遍的标准。我们旨在确定在这种情况下影响手术选择的因素。
我们回顾性地收集了在意大利两个乳腺单位接受 NAT 后原始肿瘤完全缓解(ypT0)的 BC 患者的数据,这些患者接受了 BCS 或乳房切除术。使用逻辑回归探讨了乳房切除术的预测因素。在 BCS 和乳房切除术队列中评估了远处复发和无事件生存。
共纳入 243 例患者,147 例(60.5%)接受 BCS 治疗,96 例(39.5%)接受乳房切除术治疗。在乳房切除术组中,肿瘤位置更中心、肿瘤数量更多、肿瘤更大。在单因素回归分析中,肿瘤位置、基线超声(US)和磁共振成像(MRI)上的肿瘤扩展、多发病灶和临床分期与接受乳房切除术的机会显著相关。在多因素分析中,仅基线 US 上的病灶数量和 MRI 上的扩展仍然是乳房切除术的预测因素。BCS 组的远处复发和无事件生存率明显更长。
在接受 NAT 后 ypT0 的患者中,基线肿瘤扩展和病灶数量是乳房切除术的主要预测因素。然而,在我们的队列中,BCS 并没有对生存结果产生负面影响。应努力避免对该人群进行潜在的不必要的乳房切除术,旨在最大程度地减少与手术相关的毒性,并提高患者的生活质量。