Cenacchi Valentina, Furlanis Giovanni, Menichelli Alina, Lunardelli Alberta, Pesavento Valentina, Manganotti Paolo
Clinical Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste-ASUGI, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy.
Neuropsychological Service, Clinical Unit of Rehabilitation, University Hospital and Health Services of Trieste, ASUGI, 34125 Trieste, Italy.
Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 20;14(3):293. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030293.
Neurological involvement following coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) is thought to have a neuroinflammatory etiology. Co-ultraPEALut (an anti-inflammatory molecule) and luteolin (an anti-oxidant) have shown promising results as neuroinflammation antagonists. The aim of this study was to describe cognitive impairment in patients with post-COVID-19 treated with co-ultraPEALut. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Prospective-Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and a subjective assessment were administered at baseline and after 10 months. Patients treated with co-ultraPEALut were retrospectively compared with controls. Twenty-six patients treated with co-ultraPEALut showed a significant improvement in PRMQ (T0: 51.94 ± 10.55, T1: 39.67 ± 13.02, < 0.00001) and MoCA raw score (T0: 25.76 ± 2.3, T1: 27.2 ± 2, 0.0260); the MoCA-adjusted score and the FSS questionnaires also showed an improvement, even though it was not statistically significant; and 80.77% of patients reported a subjective improvement. In the control subjects ( = 15), the improvement was not as pronounced (PRMQ T0: 45.77 ± 13.47, T1: 42.33 ± 16.86, 0.2051; FSS T0: 4.95 ± 1.57, T1: 4.06 ± 1.47, 0.1352). Patients treated with co-ultraPEALut and corticosteroids were not statistically different from those treated with co-ultraPEALut alone. Neuro-post-COVID-19 patients treated with co-ultraPEALut scored better than controls in MoCA and PRMQ questionnaires after 10 months: this may support the importance of neuroinflammation modulation for neuro-long-COVID-19.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)后的神经受累被认为具有神经炎症病因。联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯(一种抗炎分子)和木犀草素(一种抗氧化剂)作为神经炎症拮抗剂已显示出有前景的结果。本研究的目的是描述接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯治疗的COVID-19后患者的认知障碍。在基线和10个月后进行蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、前瞻性-回顾性记忆问卷(PRMQ)、疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)以及主观评估。将接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯治疗的患者与对照组进行回顾性比较。26例接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯治疗的患者在PRMQ(T0:51.94±10.55,T1:39.67±13.02,P<0.00001)和MoCA原始评分(T0:25.76±2.3,T1:27.2±2,P = 0.0260)方面有显著改善;MoCA校正评分和FSS问卷也显示有改善,尽管无统计学意义;80.77%的患者报告有主观改善。在对照组(n = 15)中,改善不那么明显(PRMQ T0:45.77±13.47,T1:42.33±16.86,P = 0.2051;FSS T0:4.95±1.57,T1:4.06±1.47,P = 0.1352)。接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯和皮质类固醇治疗的患者与仅接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯治疗的患者在统计学上无差异。接受联合超分子花生四烯酸乙酯治疗的COVID-19后神经受累患者在10个月后的MoCA和PRMQ问卷评分优于对照组:这可能支持神经炎症调节对长期COVID-19神经病变的重要性。