• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对患有罕见慢性病个体样本的德国版医疗服务可及性感知问卷的心理测量学评估

Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Perceived Access to Healthcare Questionnaire in a Sample of Individuals with Rare Chronic Diseases.

作者信息

Wehrli Susanne, Dwyer Andrew A, Landolt Markus A

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatics and Psychiatry, University Children's Hospital, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Division of Child and Adolescent Health Psychology, Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;12(6):661. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060661.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare12060661
PMID:38540625
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10970657/
Abstract

Access to healthcare is multifaceted and poses significant challenges for individuals with chronic and rare diseases (RDs). This study aimed to conduct a psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Perception of Access to Healthcare Questionnaire (PAHQ) among individuals with RDs. We conducted an evaluation of the PAHQ using a sample of 271 adults with an RD diagnosis. The 31-item instrument underwent evaluation including a comparison of three different confirmatory factor models (CFA). Subsequent steps involved item removal, reliability analysis (computation of Cronbach's alpha), and analysis of criterion-related validity. The six-factor model showed the best fit to the data and was selected for further examination. Subsequently, six items were removed. Fit indices for the final model were acceptable. Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.75 to 0.91 for the six subscales, except for the availability subscale which exhibited the lowest value (0.64). In terms of criterion-related validity, different skills relating to the navigation of access dimensions were significantly correlated with corresponding PAHQ subscales, thus confirming validity. The capacity of the PAHQ to guide targeted interventions and facilitate cross-population comparisons positions it as a valuable instrument for advancing healthcare access research and promoting equitable access to care, particularly for individuals with rare and chronic diseases.

摘要

获得医疗保健服务是多方面的,对患有慢性病和罕见病(RDs)的个人构成了重大挑战。本研究旨在对德国版医疗保健服务可及性感知问卷(PAHQ)在患有罕见病的个体中进行心理测量学评估。我们使用271名被诊断患有罕见病的成年人样本对PAHQ进行了评估。这个包含31个条目的工具进行了评估,包括对三种不同验证性因素模型(CFA)的比较。后续步骤包括项目删除、信度分析(计算克朗巴哈系数)以及效标关联效度分析。六因素模型显示出对数据的最佳拟合,并被选作进一步检验。随后,删除了六个项目。最终模型的拟合指数是可接受的。六个子量表的克朗巴哈系数范围从0.75到0.91,除了可及性子量表的值最低(0.64)。在效标关联效度方面,与医疗保健服务可及性维度导航相关的不同技能与相应的PAHQ子量表显著相关,从而证实了效度。PAHQ指导针对性干预和促进跨人群比较的能力使其成为推进医疗保健服务可及性研究和促进公平获得医疗服务的有价值工具,特别是对于患有罕见病和慢性病的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71cf/10970657/f854dad80198/healthcare-12-00661-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71cf/10970657/f854dad80198/healthcare-12-00661-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71cf/10970657/f854dad80198/healthcare-12-00661-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Perceived Access to Healthcare Questionnaire in a Sample of Individuals with Rare Chronic Diseases.针对患有罕见慢性病个体样本的德国版医疗服务可及性感知问卷的心理测量学评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Mar 15;12(6):661. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12060661.
2
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
3
Psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of a modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R-D) for patients hospitalized with acute abdominal pain.对丹麦版改良的美国疼痛协会患者结局问卷(APS-POQ-R-D)用于急性腹痛住院患者的心理测量学评估。
Scand J Pain. 2019 Jan 28;19(1):117-130. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0106.
4
Translation, Adaptation, and Validation of the Malay Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Questionnaire for Assessing the Barriers to Seeking Mental Health Care Among the Health Workforce in the East Coast Region of Peninsular Malaysia.《获取医疗服务障碍问卷》马来语版本的翻译、改编及验证:用于评估马来西亚半岛东海岸地区卫生工作者寻求心理健康护理的障碍
Cureus. 2023 Jul 5;15(7):e41405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41405. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Translation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the IcanSDM measure - a cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals.《德国版 IcanSDM 测量量表的翻译与心理计量学评估——一项针对医疗保健专业人员的横断面研究》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 2;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06430-3.
6
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the WHODAS 2.0 and prevalence of disability in a Swedish general population.WHODAS 2.0 的心理测量学评估及瑞典普通人群残疾的流行率。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2023 Apr 5;7(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41687-023-00580-0.
8
The Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) Family Impact Module: cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.《儿科生活质量量表™(PedsQL™)家庭影响模块中文版:跨文化调适与心理计量评估》。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Mar 23;9:16. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-16.
9
Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the German language person-centred climate questionnaire - staff version (PCQ-G-S): a cross-sectional study.德语文人本主义气候问卷-员工版(PCQ-G-S)的项目分布、内部一致性和结构有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04528-3.
10
Reliability and Construct Validity of the Iranian Version of Health-promoting Lifestyle Profile in a Female Adolescent Population.伊朗版健康促进生活方式量表在女性青少年群体中的信度与结构效度
Int J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;4(1):42-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Arabic Version of the Perceived Access to Health Care Questionnaire: Validation, Factor Analysis, and Rasch Modeling.《医疗保健可及性感知问卷》阿拉伯语版本:效度验证、因子分析与拉施模型分析
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Apr 29;18:11786329251336833. doi: 10.1177/11786329251336833. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring network relations between healthcare access and utilisation in individuals with rare diseases.探索罕见病患者医疗服务可及性与利用之间的网络关系。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2025 Feb 13;9:100593. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100593. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Lower Healthcare Access and Its Association With Individual Factors and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults With Rare Diseases in Switzerland.

本文引用的文献

1
A scoping review of patients' barriers to eye care for glaucoma and keratitis.一项针对青光眼和角膜炎患者眼科护理障碍的范围综述。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul-Aug;68(4):567-577. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
Rare disease emerging as a global public health priority.罕见病成为全球公共卫生重点关注对象。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 18;10:1028545. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1028545. eCollection 2022.
3
COVID-19 Information-Seeking, Health Literacy, and Worry and Anxiety During the Early Stage of the Pandemic in Switzerland: A Cross-Sectional Study.
瑞士罕见病患者医疗服务可及性较低及其与个体因素和健康相关生活质量的关系。
Int J Public Health. 2024 Sep 25;69:1607548. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607548. eCollection 2024.
COVID-19 信息搜索、健康素养与瑞士大流行早期的担忧和焦虑:一项横断面研究。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Aug 9;67:1604717. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604717. eCollection 2022.
4
Psychometric evaluation of the perceived access to health care questionnaire.感知医疗服务可及性问卷的心理计量学评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 2;21(1):638. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06655-2.
5
Can you hear us now? The impact of health-care utilization by rare disease patients in the United States.现在能听到我们的声音吗?美国罕见病患者的医疗利用情况所产生的影响。
Genet Med. 2021 Nov;23(11):2194-2201. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01241-7. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
6
Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque's conceptual framework- a scoping review.使用 Levesque 的概念框架评估医疗保健可及性 - 范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 7;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01416-3.
7
Experiences With Health Care Services in Switzerland Among Immigrant Women With Chronic Illnesses.瑞士慢性疾病移民女性的医疗服务体验。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 16;8:553438. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.553438. eCollection 2020.
8
Access to specialty healthcare in urban versus rural US populations: a systematic literature review.城市与农村美国人群获得专科医疗保健的机会:系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 18;19(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4815-5.
9
Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database.估算罕见病的累计点患病率:对孤儿药数据库的分析。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Feb;28(2):165-173. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
10
What matters to people with chronic conditions when accessing care in Australian general practice? A qualitative study of patient, carer, and provider perspectives.当人们在澳大利亚的全科医疗中寻求医疗服务时,什么对患有慢性疾病的人来说是重要的?一项对患者、照顾者和提供者观点的定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 10;20(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0973-0.