Kunyahamu Muhammad S, Daud Aziah, Tengku Ismail Tengku A, Md Tahir Mohd F
Department of Community Medicine, Universiti Sains Malaysia School of Medical Sciences, Kota Bharu, MYS.
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, MYS.
Cureus. 2023 Jul 5;15(7):e41405. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41405. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Background Mental health problems among the health workforce are a significant concern worldwide, including in Malaysia. Unfortunately, some health workforce may perceive various barriers or challenges that prevent them from seeking help. Identifying and addressing these barriers is crucial for enhancing mental health services and support. The Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE-3) questionnaire is a valuable tool that can be used for assessing these barriers among health workers. However, a validated Malay version is needed. Therefore, this study aims to translate, adapt, and validate the original version of Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation (BACE-3) into the Malay version (MBACE). Methods A rigorous process of translation and adaptation was followed to develop the Malay version of the BACE-3 questionnaire (MBACE). A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the questionnaire, with purposive sampling employed to recruit 188 participants from various job categories, including doctors, nurses, pharmacists, and non-clinical staff, such as health assistants and clerks. The analysis was conducted using the R software version 4.2.2 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria). Construct validity was determined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To assess the convergent validity, internal consistency, and reliability of the instrument, measures such as the average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CR), and Cronbach's alpha values were calculated. Results During the CFA process, two items with a factor loading less than 0.5 (items 15 and 16) were removed to improve the convergent validity and model fit. The CFA results revealed that the 2-factor model MBACE had good construct validity (root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.053; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.939; Tucker-Lewis fit index (TLI) = 0.934). The internal consistency was supported by Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 for the stigma factor and non-stigma factor. The average variance extracted (AVE) and composite reliability (CR) values further supported the questionnaire's reliability and convergent validity. Conclusion The translated and adapted 28-item MBACE questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the barrier to seeking professional mental health care among the Malaysian health workforce. This instrument has the potential to aid in the development of targeted interventions to promote mental health help-seeking behavior and enhance the well-being of the Malaysian health workforce.
卫生工作者中的心理健康问题是全球范围内的一个重大关切,在马来西亚也是如此。不幸的是,一些卫生工作者可能会察觉到各种阻碍或挑战,使他们无法寻求帮助。识别和解决这些障碍对于加强心理健康服务和支持至关重要。获得护理障碍评估(BACE-3)问卷是一种可用于评估卫生工作者中这些障碍的宝贵工具。然而,需要一个经过验证的马来语版本。因此,本研究旨在将获得护理障碍评估(BACE-3)的原始版本翻译成马来语版本(MBACE)并进行改编和验证。
遵循严格的翻译和改编过程来开发BACE-3问卷的马来语版本(MBACE)。进行了一项横断面研究以评估问卷的心理测量特性,采用目的抽样从包括医生、护士、药剂师以及诸如健康助理和办事员等非临床工作人员等不同工作类别中招募了188名参与者。使用R软件版本4.2.2(R基金会,奥地利维也纳)进行分析。使用验证性因子分析(CFA)确定结构效度。为了评估该工具的收敛效度、内部一致性和可靠性,计算了平均方差提取(AVE)、组合信度(CR)和克朗巴哈α值等指标。
在CFA过程中,删除了两个因子载荷小于0.5的项目(项目15和16),以提高收敛效度和模型拟合度。CFA结果显示,2因子模型MBACE具有良好的结构效度(近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.053;比较拟合指数(CFI)=0.939;塔克-刘易斯拟合指数(TLI)=0.934)。耻辱感因子和非耻辱感因子的克朗巴哈α值在0.92至0.94之间,支持了内部一致性。平均方差提取(AVE)和组合信度(CR)值进一步支持了问卷的可靠性和收敛效度。
经过翻译和改编的28项MBACE问卷是评估马来西亚卫生工作者寻求专业心理健康护理障碍的有效且可靠的工具。该工具有可能有助于制定有针对性的干预措施,以促进心理健康求助行为并提高马来西亚卫生工作者的福祉。