Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, Burn Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne-Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), 51109 Cologne, Germany.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 14;60(3):481. doi: 10.3390/medicina60030481.
Burn surgery on the hands is a difficult procedure due to the complex anatomy and fragility of the area. Enzymatic debridement has been shown to effectively remove burn eschar while minimizing damage to the surrounding tissue and has therefore become a standard procedure in many burn centers worldwide over the past decade. However, surprisingly, our recent literature review showed limited valid data on the long-term scarring after the enzymatic debridement of the hands. Therefore, we decided to present our study on this topic to fill this gap. This study analyzed partial-thickness to deep dermal burns on the hands that had undergone enzymatic debridement at least 12 months prior. Objective measures, like flexibility, trans-epidermal water loss, erythema, pigmentation, and microcirculation, were recorded and compared intraindividually to the uninjured skin in the same area of the other hand to assess the regenerative potential of the skin after EDNX. The subjective scar quality was evaluated using the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS), the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), and the "Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand" (DASH) questionnaire and compared interindividually to a control group of 15 patients who had received traditional surgical debridement for hand burns of the same depth. Between January 2014 and December 2015, 31 hand burns in 28 male and 3 female patients were treated with enzymatic debridement. After 12 months, the treated wounds showed no significant differences compared to the untreated skin in terms of flexibility, trans-epidermal water loss, pigmentation, and skin surface. However, the treated wounds still exhibited significantly increased blood circulation and erythema compared to the untreated areas. In comparison to the control group who received traditional surgical debridement, scarring was rated as significantly superior. In summary, it can be concluded that the objective skin quality following enzymatic debridement is comparable to that of healthy skin after 12 months and subjectively fares better than that after tangential excision. This confirms the superiority of enzymatic debridement in the treatment of deep dermal burns of the hand and solidifies its position as the gold standard.
手部烧伤的外科手术较为复杂,因为手部的解剖结构复杂,组织脆弱。酶清创术已被证实能有效去除烧伤焦痂,同时最大限度地减少对周围组织的损伤,因此在过去十年中,它已成为世界许多烧伤中心的标准程序。然而,令人惊讶的是,我们最近的文献回顾显示,在手的酶清创术后长期疤痕形成方面的数据有限。因此,我们决定就这一主题展示我们的研究,以填补这一空白。
本研究分析了手部至少 12 个月前接受酶清创术的部分厚度至深真皮烧伤。客观测量,如柔韧性、经皮水分丢失、红斑、色素沉着和微循环,被记录下来,并与同一手部未受伤区域的未受伤皮肤进行个体内比较,以评估 EDNX 后皮肤的再生潜力。使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)、温哥华瘢痕量表(VSS)和“手臂、肩部和手部残疾”(DASH)问卷评估主观瘢痕质量,并与 15 名接受手部相同深度传统手术清创的对照组患者进行个体间比较。
2014 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,28 名男性和 3 名女性患者的 31 例手部烧伤接受了酶清创术。12 个月后,与未经处理的皮肤相比,处理后的伤口在柔韧性、经皮水分丢失、色素沉着和皮肤表面方面没有显著差异。然而,与未经处理的区域相比,处理后的伤口仍显示出明显增加的血液循环和红斑。与接受传统手术清创的对照组相比,瘢痕形成的评分明显更高。
综上所述,我们可以得出结论,在 12 个月后,酶清创术治疗后皮肤的客观质量与健康皮肤相当,主观上优于切线切除。这证实了酶清创术在手部深真皮烧伤治疗中的优越性,并巩固了其作为金标准的地位。