Centre for Healthcare and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK.
Centre for Ethnic Health Research, NIHR Applied Research Collaboration-East Midlands (ARC-EM), University of Leicester, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 1;21(3):291. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030291.
Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of adverse maternal and foetal health outcomes, with effective smoking cessation support important. E-cigarette use in the general population has increased rapidly in recent years, with their use viewed as an alternate, additional offer to nicotine-replacement therapy and behavioural support. However, their use in pregnancy has limited investigation. This study aimed to understand how two e-cigarette pilots for pregnant women were delivered and implemented. Referrals to the general stop smoking in pregnancy service, as well as pilot enrolment, engagement and outcomes were recorded. Seven professionals involved in pilot 2 design, setup and/or delivery took part in semi-structured interviews informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Transcripts were deductively coded into CFIR. In total, 124 of 296 women accessed at least one visit after being contacted and offered the e-cigarette pilot (Pilot 1: N = 99, Pilot 2: N = 25). In Pilot 2, 13 (of 25) reached 4 weeks, and common reasons for withdrawal by 12 weeks included relapse, loss of contact and no further support wanted. Forty-five (36.3%) validated quits were reported (Pilot 1: 32 of 99 (32.3%); Pilot 2: 13 of 25 (52%)). Facilitators included regular communication and the advisors physically taking e-cigarettes to home visits. Barriers included misalignment between the pilot and the standard treatment offer and availability of the staff resource. Enrolment to both pilots was demonstrated, with greater enrolment in one pilot and notable quit rates among women across both pilots. The perceived role of e-cigarettes for pregnant women varied, and a lack of staff resources explained some challenges. Adaptations may be needed during scale-up, including additional resources and the alignment of the e-cigarette provision to standard treatment.
孕期吸烟会增加不良母婴健康结局的风险,有效的戒烟支持很重要。近年来,电子烟在普通人群中的使用迅速增加,它们被视为尼古丁替代疗法和行为支持的另一种额外选择。然而,它们在孕期的使用受到的研究有限。本研究旨在了解为孕妇提供的两个电子烟试验是如何实施的。记录了向一般孕期戒烟服务的转介情况,以及试验的招募、参与和结果。参与试验 2 设计、设立和/或实施的 7 名专业人员接受了基于综合实施研究框架(CFIR)的半结构化访谈。转录本被演绎编码为 CFIR。在总共联系并提供电子烟试验的 296 名女性中,共有 124 名(Pilot 1:N=99;Pilot 2:N=25)至少访问了一次。在 Pilot 2 中,有 13 名(25 名中的 13 名)达到了 4 周,12 周时退出的常见原因包括复发、失去联系和不再需要进一步支持。报告了 45 例(36.3%)经验证的戒烟(Pilot 1:99 例中的 32 例(32.3%);Pilot 2:25 例中的 13 例(52%))。促进因素包括定期沟通和顾问亲自将电子烟带到家访。障碍包括试验与标准治疗方案之间的不匹配以及工作人员资源的可用性。两个试验都展示了招募情况,一个试验的招募人数更多,两个试验中的女性戒烟率都很高。对孕妇电子烟的看法各不相同,工作人员资源的缺乏解释了一些挑战。在扩大规模时可能需要进行调整,包括增加资源和使电子烟的提供与标准治疗相匹配。