Cegolon Luca, Larese Filon Francesca
Department of Medical, Surgical & Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34128 Trieste, Italy.
Occupational Medicine Unit, University Health Agency Giuliano-Isontina (ASUGI), 34148 Trieste, Italy.
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Feb 28;12(3):254. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12030254.
: The risk of COVID-19 increases in any occupation entailing intense social interactions. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 among civil servants of Trieste city council (northeastern Italy) over the entire pandemic. : The crude incidence rate of COVID-19 was estimated from 1 March 2020 to 31 January 2023 by explanatory factors, expressing the estimate as COVID-19 events x 10,000 person-days (P-d) at risk. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was fitted to examine the risk of primary COVID-19 infection and reinfections, reporting adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). : The cohort of Trieste city council was mainly composed of administrative clerks (48.5%), nursery teachers (33%), technicians (9.9%) and local police officers (8.5%). Between 1 March 2020 and 31 January 2023, 1444 (62.4%) employees tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 at least once and 18.1% (=262/1444) at least twice. By the end of this study, 55% (N = 1272) of employees had received at least three doses of COVID-19 vaccine, whereas 19.7% (N = 457) remained unvaccinated. At multiple Cox regression analysis, the adjusted risk of primary COVID-19 events during the entire study period increased in employees aged 40-49 years (aHR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.01; 2.71), females (aHR = 1.28; 95%CI: 1.12; 1.45), local police officers (aHR = 1.82; 95%CI: 1.50; 2.22) and nursery teachers (aHR = 1.27; 95%CI: 1.13; 1.43). However, whilst the risk of primary infections in police officers increased already during the Alpha transmission period (aHR = 6.82; 95%CI: 4.48; 10.40), progressively reducing across subsequent variants, for nursery teachers, it increased during the Delta wave (aHR = 2.42; 1.70; 3.44), reducing with Omicron (aHR = 1.23; 95%CI: 1.07; 1.40). Compared to unvaccinated colleagues, during the entire study period the risk of primary infections was significantly lower in employees immunized with three (aHR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.36; 0.47) or four (aHR = 0.30; 95%CI: 0.23; 0.40) doses of COVID-19 vaccine, for a vaccine effectiveness (VE) of 58% and 70%, respectively. The protective effect of vaccination against primary infections was confirmed in the sub-group analysis by main pandemic waves, for a VE of 75% for one dose against 99% for two doses during the Alpha transmission period, slightly reducing to 59% and 70% in Delta time, respectively. During the Omicron wave, the risk of primary SARS-CoV-2 infections diminished significantly with three (aHR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.36; 0.49) or four vaccine doses (aHR = 0.09; 95%CI: 0.05; 0.16), for a VE of 58% and 91%, respectively. Moreover, the risk of primary SARS-CoV-2 reinfections during the entire study period reduced with one (aHR = 0.47; 95%CI: 0.27; 0.82), two (aHR = 0.42; 95%CI: 0.30; 0.58), three (aHR = 0.32; 95%CI: 0.24; 0.44) or four vaccine doses (aHR = 0.14; 95%CI: 0.05; 0.46), for a VE of 53%, 58%, 68% and 86% against reinfections, respectively. No significant difference in VE was associated with heterologous versus homologous triple vaccination, both against primary infections or reinfections. : Primary SARS-CoV-2 infections were more likely among nursery teachers and local police officers. The risk of both primary infections and reinfections reduced with higher number of doses of COVID-19 vaccine, regardless of the pandemic wave. Since city council civil servants were swab tested on demand or for contact tracing, the estimation of COVID-19 risk and VE largely missed aymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections. On the one hand, the present study confirmed the protective effect of COVID-19 vaccination against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections; on the other hand, it highlighted not only the importance of continuous booster doses to keep up the humoral immunity over time but also the importance of updated vaccine formulations to prevent and control the spread of a highly mutable virus. Moreover, the protective effect of the first two doses against reinfections confirmed the efficacy of hybrid immunity during Omicron time.
在任何需要密切社交互动的职业中,感染新冠病毒的风险都会增加。本研究旨在调查意大利东北部的里雅斯特市议会公务员在整个疫情期间感染新冠病毒的影响。:通过解释性因素估计了2020年3月1日至2023年1月31日期间新冠病毒的粗发病率,将估计值表示为每10000人日(P-d)的新冠病毒感染事件。采用多变量Cox比例风险回归模型来检验初次感染新冠病毒和再次感染的风险,报告调整后的风险比(aHR)及95%置信区间(95%CI)。:的里雅斯特市议会的队列主要由行政职员(48.5%)、幼儿园教师(33%)、技术人员(9.9%)和当地警察(8.5%)组成。在2020年3月1日至2023年1月31日期间,1444名(62.4%)员工至少有一次新冠病毒检测呈阳性,18.1%(=262/1444)至少有两次检测呈阳性。在本研究结束时,55%(N = 1272)的员工至少接种了三剂新冠疫苗,而19.7%(N = 457)仍未接种。在多变量Cox回归分析中,在整个研究期间,40 - 49岁的员工(aHR = 1.65;95%CI:1.01;2.71)、女性(aHR = 1.28;95%CI:1.12;1.45)、当地警察(aHR = 1.82;95%CI:1.50;2.22)和幼儿园教师(aHR = 1.27;95%CI:1.13;1.43)初次感染新冠病毒事件的调整风险增加。然而,虽然警察初次感染的风险在阿尔法毒株传播期就已增加(aHR = 6.82;95%CI:4.48;10.40),在随后的毒株变异中逐渐降低,但对于幼儿园教师来说,其风险在德尔塔毒株浪潮期间增加(aHR = 2.42;1.70;3.44),在奥密克戎毒株期间降低(aHR = 1.23;95%CI:1.07;1.40)。与未接种疫苗的同事相比,在整个研究期间,接种三剂(aHR = 0.42;95%CI:0.36;0.47)或四剂(aHR = 0.30;95%CI:0.23;0.40)新冠疫苗的员工初次感染的风险显著更低,疫苗有效性(VE)分别为58%和70%。在按主要疫情浪潮进行的亚组分析中,疫苗接种对初次感染的保护作用得到证实,在阿尔法毒株传播期,一剂疫苗的VE为75%,两剂为99%,在德尔塔毒株时期分别略有降至59%和70%。在奥密克戎毒株浪潮期间,接种三剂(aHR = 0.42;95%CI:0.36;0.49)或四剂疫苗(aHR = 0.09;95%CI:0.05;0.16)后,初次感染新冠病毒的风险显著降低,VE分别为58%和91%。此外,在整个研究期间,接种一剂(aHR = 0.47;95%CI:0.27;0.82)、两剂(aHR = 0.42;95%CI:0.30;0.58)、三剂(aHR = 0.32;95%CI:0.24;0.44)或四剂疫苗(aHR = 0.14;95%CI:0.05;0.46)后,再次感染新冠病毒的风险降低,针对再次感染的VE分别为53%、58%、68%和86%。对于初次感染或再次感染,异源与同源三剂疫苗接种的VE没有显著差异。:幼儿园教师和当地警察更易发生初次感染新冠病毒。无论疫情浪潮如何,随着新冠疫苗接种剂量的增加,初次感染和再次感染的风险都会降低。由于市议会公务员是根据需求或为了接触者追踪进行拭子检测,对新冠病毒风险和VE的估计很大程度上遗漏了无症状的新冠病毒感染。一方面,本研究证实了新冠疫苗接种对有症状的新冠病毒感染的保护作用;另一方面,它不仅强调了持续接种加强针以维持长期体液免疫的重要性,还强调了更新疫苗配方对于预防和控制高度变异病毒传播的重要性。此外,前两剂疫苗对再次感染的保护作用证实了奥密克戎毒株时期混合免疫的有效性。