• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师为何实施(或不实施)推荐的教学实践?计划行为理论的应用。

Why teachers do (or do not) implement recommended teaching practices? An application of the theory of planned behavior.

作者信息

Dierendonck Christophe, Poncelet Débora, Tinnes-Vigne Mélanie

机构信息

Department of Education and Social Work, Institute for Lifelong Learning and Guidance, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 13;15:1269954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269954. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269954
PMID:38544506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10966465/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In Luxembourg, competency-based practices (CBP), differentiated instruction (DI), and formative assessment (FA) have been imposed by the 2009 school law. Referring to the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study examined factors influencing the implementation of these practices in classrooms.

METHODS

Teachers participated in an online survey assessing their attitudes, subjective norm, perception of behavioral control, intention, and pedagogical practices regarding CBP, DI, or FA. Measurement models were used in structural equation models testing the TPB.

RESULTS

If the main relationships postulated by the theory were confirmed, some inconstancies were observed depending on the targeted practices. Structural equation TPB models controlling for gender, experience, teaching level, and socio-economic level of the school population explained between 20 and 45% of the variance in teachers' practices, and between 65 and 75% of the variance in teachers' intention to use these practices.

DISCUSSION

The relevance of the TPB for studying teaching practices and implications for professional training are discussed.

摘要

引言

在卢森堡,2009年的学校法规定了基于能力的实践(CBP)、差异化教学(DI)和形成性评估(FA)。本研究参照计划行为理论(TPB),考察了影响这些实践在课堂中实施的因素。

方法

教师参与了一项在线调查,评估他们对CBP、DI或FA的态度、主观规范、行为控制感知、意图及教学实践。在结构方程模型中使用测量模型来检验TPB。

结果

尽管该理论假设的主要关系得到了证实,但根据目标实践观察到了一些不一致之处。控制学校人群的性别、经验、教学水平和社会经济水平的结构方程TPB模型解释了教师实践中20%至45%的方差,以及教师使用这些实践意图中65%至75%的方差。

讨论

讨论了TPB对研究教学实践的相关性以及对专业培训的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/b1cbdc9ccd71/fpsyg-15-1269954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/608a6eb1039d/fpsyg-15-1269954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/ac2318e6cd13/fpsyg-15-1269954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/b1cbdc9ccd71/fpsyg-15-1269954-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/608a6eb1039d/fpsyg-15-1269954-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/ac2318e6cd13/fpsyg-15-1269954-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc76/10966465/b1cbdc9ccd71/fpsyg-15-1269954-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Why teachers do (or do not) implement recommended teaching practices? An application of the theory of planned behavior.教师为何实施(或不实施)推荐的教学实践?计划行为理论的应用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 13;15:1269954. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269954. eCollection 2024.
2
A comparative study of Chinese and American preservice teachers' intention to teach online based on the Theory of Planned Behavior.基于计划行为理论的中美职前教师在线教学意愿比较研究
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(6):6391-6405. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11442-5. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
3
Variables that influence teachers' practice of differentiated instruction in Chinese classrooms: A study from teachers' perspectives.影响中国课堂教师差异化教学实践的变量:一项基于教师视角的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1124259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124259. eCollection 2023.
4
Assessing the Relationship Between Teacher Inclusive Beliefs, Behaviors, and Competences of Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders.评估教师的包容性信念、行为与自闭症谱系障碍学生能力之间的关系。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06473-5.
5
Analyzing pre-service biology teachers' intention to teach evolution using the theory of planned behavior.运用计划行为理论分析职前生物教师教授进化论的意愿。
Evolution (N Y). 2022;15(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12052-022-00175-1. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
6
The impact of social cognitive and personality factors on teachers' reported inclusive behaviour.社会认知和人格因素对教师所报告的包容性行为的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Sep;86(3):461-80. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12118. Epub 2016 May 4.
7
Attitudes and intentions of Greek teachers towards teaching pupils with dyslexia: An application of the theory of planned behaviour.希腊教师对诵读困难学生教学的态度与意图:计划行为理论的应用
Dyslexia. 2018 May;24(2):128-139. doi: 10.1002/dys.1586. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
Exploring Physical Education Teachers' Intention and Perceived Constraints in Offering Online Lessons Using the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Multi-Country Analysis.运用计划行为理论探究体育教师开展在线课程的意愿及感知到的限制因素:一项多国分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Apr 9;14(4):305. doi: 10.3390/bs14040305.
9
Development and validation of a generic questionnaire for the implementation of complex medical interventions.用于实施复杂医疗干预措施的通用问卷的开发与验证
Ger Med Sci. 2014 Apr 1;12:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/000193. eCollection 2014.
10
Explaining Pre-service Teachers' Intentions to Use Technology-Enabled Learning: An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior.解释职前教师使用技术支持学习的意图:计划行为理论的扩展模型。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 21;13:900806. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.900806. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating ajzen's theory of planned behavior in Saudi translation education programs using a reflective structural equation model.使用反思性结构方程模型验证沙特翻译教育项目中阿詹的计划行为理论。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19566. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05363-9.
2
Understanding the Use of Social and Emotional Learning in Elementary Schools: A Theory of Planned Behaviour Perspective.理解小学阶段社会情感学习的应用:计划行为理论视角
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Mar 27;15(4):48. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15040048.

本文引用的文献

1
Dealing with Careless Responding in Survey Data: Prevention, Identification, and Recommended Best Practices.处理调查数据中的粗心作答:预防、识别及推荐的最佳实践
Annu Rev Psychol. 2023 Jan 18;74:577-596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-040422-045007. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
2
The impact of social cognitive and personality factors on teachers' reported inclusive behaviour.社会认知和人格因素对教师所报告的包容性行为的影响。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2016 Sep;86(3):461-80. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12118. Epub 2016 May 4.
3
Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.
谁关心,谁不关心?回应不足反映了回应者的个性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Aug;111(2):218-29. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000085. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
Identifying careless responses in survey data.识别调查数据中的粗心回答。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):437-55. doi: 10.1037/a0028085. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
5
Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.社会科学研究中方法偏差的来源及控制方法建议。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:539-69. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
6
Planned missing data designs in psychological research.心理学研究中的计划缺失数据设计。
Psychol Methods. 2006 Dec;11(4):323-43. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.4.323.
7
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a meta-analytic review.计划行为理论的有效性:一项元分析综述。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99. doi: 10.1348/014466601164939.