Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜附件手术中使用与不使用导尿管的评估:一项随机对照试验。

Evaluation of the use versus nonuse of urinary catheterization during laparoscopic adnexal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Jia Yujian, Ge Huisheng, Xiong Liling, Wang Lulu, Peng Jieru, Liu Ying, Yu Jie, Liao Jianmei, Wang Hui, Gan Xiaoqin, Lin Yonghong

机构信息

Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

Medical Administrative Department, Chengdu Women's and Children's Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Mar 16;10(6):e27741. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27741. eCollection 2024 Mar 30.

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the feasibility and safety of performing gynecological single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery without urethral catheterization in a day surgery setting. A total of 153 patients with adnexal disease were enrolled in this prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). All subjects performed single-port transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted adnexal surgery between March 2021 and July 2022 in a day surgery center. After completion of the baseline survey, participants were randomized into one of three groups. Participants were randomized into one of three groups: uncatheterized (n = 51), intermittent catheterized (n = 51), or indwelling catheterized (n = 51). The primary outcomes were the incidence of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and microscopic hematuria, and the secondary outcomes included the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI), the incidence of urinary retention, the incidence of bladder injury, the time till first urination, the time till first ambulation, the time till first exhaust, the time till first feeding and Kolcaba comfort score. The incidence of postoperative LUTS in the uncatheterized group (17.65%) was lower than that in the intermittent catheterized group (52.94%) and the indwelling catheterized group (84.31%), and there was significant difference between the two catheterized groups (P < 0.001). In the patients without vaginal manipulation, the incidence of microscopic hematuria in the uncatheterized group (0%) was lower than that in the intermittent catheterized group (37.50%) and the indwelling catheterized group (38.89%) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the first urination time, first ambulation time, first exhaust time, first feeding time, and comfort score among the three groups (P > 0.05). Moreover, no urinary retention, UTI and bladder injury were recorded in the three groups. Gynecological single-port laparoscopic adnexal surgery without urinary catheter is safe and feasible in a day surgery ward, which can reduce the incidence of postoperative LUTS and microscopic hematuria.

摘要

我们进行了一项随机对照试验,以评估在日间手术环境中进行妇科单孔经脐腹腔镜辅助附件手术且不插导尿管的可行性和安全性。共有153例附件疾病患者纳入了这项前瞻性随机对照试验(RCT)。所有受试者于2021年3月至2022年7月在一家日间手术中心接受了单孔经脐腹腔镜辅助附件手术。完成基线调查后,参与者被随机分为三组之一。参与者被随机分为三组之一:不插导尿管组(n = 51)、间歇性插导尿管组(n = 51)或留置导尿管组(n = 51)。主要结局是下尿路症状(LUTS)和镜下血尿的发生率,次要结局包括尿路感染(UTI)的发生率、尿潴留的发生率、膀胱损伤的发生率、首次排尿时间、首次下床活动时间、首次排气时间、首次进食时间和Kolcaba舒适度评分。不插导尿管组术后LUTS的发生率(17.65%)低于间歇性插导尿管组(52.94%)和留置导尿管组(84.31%),且两组插导尿管组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。在未进行阴道操作的患者中,不插导尿管组镜下血尿的发生率(0%)低于间歇性插导尿管组(37.50%)和留置导尿管组(38.89%)(P < 0.05)。三组之间的首次排尿时间、首次下床活动时间、首次排气时间、首次进食时间和舒适度评分无显著差异(P > 0.05)。此外,三组均未记录到尿潴留、UTI和膀胱损伤。在日间手术病房中,不插导尿管的妇科单孔腹腔镜附件手术是安全可行的,可降低术后LUTS和镜下血尿的发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4064/10965526/0f7c19af79b1/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验