Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Department of Medicine, Division of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Clin Transplant. 2024 Apr;38(4):e15295. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15295.
Data on long-term outcomes following A2/A2B to B kidney transplants since the 2014 kidney allocation system (KAS) changes are few. The primary aim of this study is to report our 7-year experience with A2/A2B to B kidney transplants and to compare post-transplant outcomes of A2/A2B to a concurrent group of B to B kidney transplants. Additionally, the study evaluates the impact of pre-transplant anti-A1 titers on survival outcomes in A2/A2B transplants.
This retrospective, single-center analysis included all adults who received A2/A2B to B deceased donor kidney transplants from December 2014 to June 2021 compared to B to B recipients. The effects of pre-transplant IgM/IgG titers, stratified as ≤1:8 and ≥1:16, on death-censored, rejection-free, and overall graft survival were tested.
Fifty-three A2/A2B and 114 B to B adults were included with a median follow-up time of 32 months. Overall graft survival, patient survival, and rejection-free graft survival did not differ between the two groups. There were no differences between the groups' overall kidney function values (p > .80) or their temporal trajectories (time by group interaction p > .11). Unadjusted death-censored graft survival was lower in A2/A2B to B compared to B recipients (p = .03), but the effect was not significant (p = .195) after adjusting for any readmissions (p = .96), rejection episodes (p < .001) or BK infection (p = .76). We did not detect an effect of pre-transplant titer group on death-censored (p = .59), rejection-free (p = .61), or overall graft survival (p = .26) CONCLUSIONS: A2/A2B to B kidney transplants have comparable overall patient and graft survival, rejection-free graft survival, and longitudinal renal function compared to B to B transplants at our center. Allograft survival outcomes were not significantly different between patients with low and high pre-transplant anti-A1 IgM/IgG titers.
自 2014 年肾脏分配系统 (KAS) 改变以来,关于 A2/A2B 至 B 肾脏移植后长期结果的数据很少。本研究的主要目的是报告我们 7 年的 A2/A2B 至 B 肾脏移植经验,并比较 A2/A2B 与同期 B 至 B 肾脏移植的移植后结果。此外,该研究还评估了移植前抗 A1 滴度对 A2/A2B 移植中存活结果的影响。
这项回顾性、单中心分析包括了 2014 年 12 月至 2021 年 6 月期间所有接受 A2/A2B 至 B 已故供体肾脏移植的成年人,与 B 至 B 受者进行比较。检测移植前 IgM/IgG 滴度(分为≤1:8 和≥1:16)对死亡风险校正、排斥反应无、整体移植物存活的影响。
共纳入 53 例 A2/A2B 和 114 例 B 至 B 例成人,中位随访时间为 32 个月。两组间总体移植物存活率、患者存活率和排斥反应无移植物存活率无差异。两组的整体肾功能值(p>.80)或其时间轨迹(组间时间交互作用 p>.11)无差异。与 B 受体相比,A2/A2B 至 B 的死亡风险校正移植物存活率较低(p=.03),但调整任何再入院(p=.96)、排斥发作(p<.001)或 BK 感染(p=.76)后,差异无统计学意义(p=.195)。我们未检测到移植前滴度组对死亡风险校正(p=.59)、排斥反应无(p=.61)或整体移植物存活(p=.26)的影响。
在我们中心,A2/A2B 至 B 肾脏移植的总体患者和移植物存活率、排斥反应无移植物存活率和纵向肾功能与 B 至 B 移植相当。在低和高移植前抗 A1 IgM/IgG 滴度的患者之间,同种异体移植物存活率结果无显著差异。