Suppr超能文献

基于 ACGAN 的小样本 AML 白细胞分类方法。

AML leukocyte classification method for small samples based on ACGAN.

机构信息

School of Artificial Intelligence, 232838 Chongqing University of Technology , Chongqing, PR.China.

College of Computer Science and Cyber Security, 47908 Chengdu University of Technology , Chengdu, P.R. China.

出版信息

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2024 Mar 29;69(5):491-499. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2024-0028. Print 2024 Oct 28.

Abstract

Leukemia is a class of hematologic malignancies, of which acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common. Screening and diagnosis of AML are performed by microscopic examination or chemical testing of images of the patient's peripheral blood smear. In smear-microscopy, the ability to quickly identify, count, and differentiate different types of blood cells is critical for disease diagnosis. With the development of deep learning (DL), classification techniques based on neural networks have been applied to the recognition of blood cells. However, DL methods have high requirements for the number of valid datasets. This study aims to assess the applicability of the auxiliary classification generative adversarial network (ACGAN) in the classification task for small samples of white blood cells. The method is trained on the TCIA dataset, and the classification accuracy is compared with two classical classifiers and the current state-of-the-art methods. The results are evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. The accuracy of the ACGAN on the validation set is 97.1 % and the precision, recall, and F1 scores on the validation set are 97.5 , 97.3, and 97.4 %, respectively. In addition, ACGAN received a higher score in comparison with other advanced methods, which can indicate that it is competitive in classification accuracy.

摘要

白血病是一类血液系统恶性肿瘤,其中急性髓细胞白血病(AML)最为常见。AML 的筛查和诊断通过对患者外周血涂片的图像进行显微镜检查或化学检测来完成。在涂片显微镜检查中,快速识别、计数和区分不同类型血细胞的能力对疾病诊断至关重要。随着深度学习(DL)的发展,基于神经网络的分类技术已应用于血细胞的识别。然而,DL 方法对有效数据集的数量要求较高。本研究旨在评估辅助分类生成对抗网络(ACGAN)在白细胞小样本分类任务中的适用性。该方法在 TCIA 数据集上进行训练,并将分类准确性与两种经典分类器和当前最先进的方法进行比较。使用准确性、精度、召回率和 F1 分数来评估结果。ACGAN 在验证集上的准确性为 97.1%,在验证集上的精度、召回率和 F1 分数分别为 97.5%、97.3%和 97.4%。此外,ACGAN 与其他先进方法相比获得了更高的分数,这表明其在分类准确性方面具有竞争力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验