• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和乌干达的导乐分娩中心:案例研究地点的经济评估。

Midwife-led birthing centres in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda: an economic evaluation of case study sites.

机构信息

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Mar 28;9(3):e013643. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013643.

DOI:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013643
PMID:38548343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10982789/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals to reduce maternal and neonatal mortality rates will require the expansion and strengthening of quality maternal health services. Midwife-led birth centres (MLBCs) are an alternative to hospital-based care for low-risk pregnancies where the lead professional at the time of birth is a trained midwife. These have been used in many countries to improve birth outcomes.

METHODS

The cost analysis used primary data collection from four MLBCs in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda (n=12 MLBC sites). Modelled cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), measured as incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted, of MLBCs to standard care in each country. Results were presented in 2022 US dollars.

RESULTS

Cost per birth in MLBCs varied greatly within and between countries, from US$21 per birth at site 3, Bangladesh to US$2374 at site 2, Uganda. Midwife salary and facility operation costs were the primary drivers of costs in most MLBCs. Six of the 12 MLBCs produced better health outcomes at a lower cost (dominated) compared with standard care; and three produced better health outcomes at a higher cost compared with standard care, with ICERs ranging from US$571/DALY averted to US$55 942/DALY averted.

CONCLUSION

MLBCs appear to be able to produce better health outcomes at lower cost or be highly cost-effective compared with standard care. Costs do vary across sites and settings, and so further exploration of costs and cost-effectiveness as a part of implementation and establishment activities should be a priority.

摘要

简介

为了实现降低母婴死亡率的可持续发展目标,需要扩大和加强优质的母婴保健服务。助产士主导的分娩中心(MLBC)是低风险妊娠替代医院护理的一种选择,分娩时的主导专业人员是经过培训的助产士。许多国家已经在使用这些中心来改善分娩结果。

方法

成本分析使用了孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和乌干达的四个 MLBC 的原始数据收集(n=12 个 MLBC 地点)。对模型成本效益分析进行了比较,以比较每个国家 MLBC 与标准护理的增量成本效益比(ICER),以每避免一个残疾调整生命年(DALY)的增量成本来衡量。结果以 2022 年美元呈现。

结果

MLBC 中的每个分娩的成本在各国内部和之间差异很大,从孟加拉国第 3 个地点的每个分娩 21 美元到乌干达第 2 个地点的 2374 美元。助产士工资和设施运营成本是大多数 MLBC 成本的主要驱动因素。在 12 个 MLBC 中有 6 个在成本较低的情况下产生了更好的健康结果(占主导地位),与标准护理相比;有 3 个在成本较高的情况下产生了更好的健康结果,ICER 范围从每避免一个 DALY 的 571 美元到每避免一个 DALY 的 55942 美元。

结论

MLBC 似乎能够以更低的成本或具有更高的成本效益来产生更好的健康结果,与标准护理相比。成本确实因地点和环境而异,因此作为实施和建立活动的一部分,进一步探索成本和成本效益应成为优先事项。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f9/10982789/8d8d7eb83ab6/bmjgh-2023-013643f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f9/10982789/7adf5c3c97cb/bmjgh-2023-013643f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f9/10982789/8d8d7eb83ab6/bmjgh-2023-013643f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f9/10982789/7adf5c3c97cb/bmjgh-2023-013643f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6f9/10982789/8d8d7eb83ab6/bmjgh-2023-013643f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Midwife-led birthing centres in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Uganda: an economic evaluation of case study sites.孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和乌干达的导乐分娩中心:案例研究地点的经济评估。
BMJ Glob Health. 2024 Mar 28;9(3):e013643. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013643.
2
Midwife-led birthing centres in four countries: a case study.四国导乐分娩中心:案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 17;23(1):1105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10125-2.
3
Perceptions of quality of care in Midwife-led Birth Centres (MLBCs) in Uganda: Why do women choose MLBCs over other options?乌干达导乐分娩中心(MLBC)的护理质量感知:为什么女性选择 MLBC 而不是其他选择?
Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101612. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101612. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
4
Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania.孟加拉国和坦桑尼亚提供产后宫内节育器服务的经济评价。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Mar 31;9(1):107-122. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00447.
5
Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units.根据计划分娩地点是由助产士主导的分娩中心还是产科主导的单位,产妇和新生儿的严重不良结局情况。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2465-2474. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14971. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a new rotavirus vaccination program in Pakistan: a decision tree model.巴基斯坦新轮状病毒疫苗接种计划的成本效益:决策树模型。
Vaccine. 2013 Dec 9;31(51):6072-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
7
Which low- and middle-income countries have midwife-led birthing centres and what are the main characteristics of these centres? A scoping review and scoping survey.哪些中低收入国家设有导乐助产士主导的分娩中心,这些中心的主要特征是什么?一项范围界定综述和范围界定调查。
Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103717. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103717. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
Cost-effectiveness of planned birth in a birth centre compared with alternative planned places of birth: results of the Dutch Birth Centre study.与其他替代的计划分娩地点相比,分娩中心计划分娩的成本效益:荷兰分娩中心研究结果。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e016960. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016960.
9
The cost-effectiveness of using results-based financing to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality in Malawi.利用基于成果的融资来降低马拉维母婴死亡率的成本效益。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002260.
10
Budget impact and cost-effectiveness analyses of the COBRA-BPS multicomponent hypertension management programme in rural communities in Bangladesh, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka.孟加拉国、巴基斯坦和斯里兰卡农村社区中 COBRA-BPS 多组分高血压管理方案的预算影响和成本效益分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 May;9(5):e660-e667. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00033-4. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cost and Cost-Effectiveness of Childbirth Settings: A Systematic Review.分娩环境的成本及成本效益:一项系统综述
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00957-w.
2
A Scoping Review Mapping Economic Evaluations of Midwifery Service Provision and the Midwifery Workforce.一项关于助产服务提供和助产人员劳动力经济评估的范围综述映射研究
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Mar 19. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00962-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Which low- and middle-income countries have midwife-led birthing centres and what are the main characteristics of these centres? A scoping review and scoping survey.哪些中低收入国家设有导乐助产士主导的分娩中心,这些中心的主要特征是什么?一项范围界定综述和范围界定调查。
Midwifery. 2023 Aug;123:103717. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103717. Epub 2023 May 8.
2
Value in maternal care: Using the Learning Health System to facilitate action.孕产妇保健的价值:利用学习型卫生系统促进行动。
Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):589-594. doi: 10.1111/birt.12684. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
3
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force.
《健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)》2022 年解释与详述:ISPOR CHEERS II 良好实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):10-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008.
4
Severe maternal morbidity in the Asia Pacific: a systematic review and meta-analysis.亚太地区孕产妇严重发病情况:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Jul 20;14:100217. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100217. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Trends and characteristics of women undergoing induction of labour in a tertiary hospital setting: A cross-sectional study.在一家三级医院环境中接受引产的妇女的趋势和特征:一项横断面研究。
Women Birth. 2022 Mar;35(2):e181-e187. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 24.
6
Scaling up care by midwives must now be a global priority.扩大助产士护理服务规模现在必须成为全球优先事项。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e2-e3. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30478-2. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
7
Potential impact of midwives in preventing and reducing maternal and neonatal mortality and stillbirths: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study.助产士在预防和减少孕产妇和新生儿死亡及死产方面的潜在影响:一项挽救生命工具建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jan;9(1):e24-e32. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30397-1. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Birth models of care and intervention rates: The impact of birth centres.分娩模式与干预率:分娩中心的影响。
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1395-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
Freestanding Midwife-Led Units: A Narrative Review.独立助产士主导单位:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2020 Apr 18;25(3):181-188. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_209_19. eCollection 2020 May-Jun.
10
Financing Maternity and Early Childhood Healthcare in The Australian Healthcare System: Costs to Funders in Private and Public Hospitals Over the First 1000 Days.澳大利亚医疗体系中的母婴保健和早期儿童保健筹资:私营和公立医院头 1000 天的供资者成本。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Sep 1;10(9):554-563. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.68.