Suppr超能文献

根据计划分娩地点是由助产士主导的分娩中心还是产科主导的单位,产妇和新生儿的严重不良结局情况。

Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units.

作者信息

Rollet Clara, Le Ray Camille, Vendittelli Françoise, Blondel Béatrice, Chantry Anne Alice

机构信息

Center of Research in Epidemiology and StatisticS (CRESS), Obstetrical Perinatal and Pediatric Epidemiology Research Team (EPOPé), INSERM, INRA, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Port Royal Maternity Unit, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2465-2474. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14971. Epub 2024 Sep 15.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The establishment of midwife-led birth centers (MLBCs) is still being debated. The study aimed to compare severe adverse outcomes and mode of birth in low-risk women according to their birth planned in MLBCs or in obstetric-led units (OUs) in France.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used nationwide databases to select low-risk women at the start of care in labor in MLBCs (n = 1294) and in OUs (n = 5985). Using multilevel logistic regression, we compared severe adverse maternal and neonatal morbidity as a composite outcome and as individual outcomes. These include severe postpartum hemorrhage (≥1000 mL of blood loss), obstetrical anal sphincter injury, maternal admission to an intensive care unit, maternal death, a 5-minute Apgar score <7, neonatal resuscitation at birth, neonatal admission to an intensive care unit, and stillbirth or neonatal death. We also studied the mode of birth and the role of prophylactic administration of oxytocin at birth in the association between birth settings and severe postpartum hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcome indicated a slightly higher rate in women in MLBCs compared to OUs according to unadjusted analyses (4.6% in MLBCs vs. 3.4% in OUs; cOR 1.36; 95%CI [1.01-1.83]), but the difference was not significant between birth settings after adjustment (aOR 1.37 [0.92-2.05]). Severe neonatal morbidity alone was not different (1.7% vs. 1.6%; aOR 1.17 [0.55-2.47]). However, severe maternal morbidity was significantly higher in MLBCs than in OUs (3.0% vs. 1.9%; aOR 1.61 [1.09-2.39]), mainly explained by higher risks of severe postpartum hemorrhage (2.4 vs. 1.1%; aOR 2.37 [1.29-4.36]), with 2 out of 5 in MLBCs partly explained by the low use of prophylactic oxytocin. Cesarean and operative vaginal births were significantly decreased in women with a birth planned in MLBCs.

CONCLUSIONS

In France, 3 to 4% of low-risk women experienced a severe adverse maternal or neonatal outcome regardless of the planned birth setting. Results were favorable for MLBCs in terms of mode of birth but not for severe postpartum hemorrhage, which could be partly addressed by revising practices of prophylactic administration of oxytocin.

摘要

引言

由助产士主导的分娩中心(MLBCs)的建立仍在讨论中。本研究旨在比较法国低风险女性在MLBCs或产科主导单位(OUs)计划分娩时的严重不良结局和分娩方式。

材料与方法

我们使用全国性数据库,选取在MLBCs(n = 1294)和OUs(n = 5985)开始分娩护理时的低风险女性。通过多水平逻辑回归,我们比较了严重的母婴不良发病率,将其作为一个综合结局和个体结局。这些包括严重产后出血(失血≥1000毫升)、产科肛门括约肌损伤、产妇入住重症监护病房、产妇死亡、5分钟Apgar评分<7、出生时新生儿复苏、新生儿入住重症监护病房以及死产或新生儿死亡。我们还研究了分娩方式以及分娩时预防性使用缩宫素在分娩环境与严重产后出血之间关联中的作用。

结果

根据未调整分析,MLBCs中的女性严重母婴不良结局发生率略高于OUs(MLBCs中为4.6%,OUs中为3.4%;校正比值比1.36;95%置信区间[1.01 - 1.83]),但调整后分娩环境之间的差异不显著(调整后比值比1.37 [0.92 - 2.05])。仅严重新生儿发病率无差异(1.7%对1.6%;调整后比值比1.17 [0.55 - 2.47])。然而,MLBCs中严重产妇发病率显著高于OUs(3.0%对1.9%;调整后比值比1.61 [1.09 - 2.39]),主要原因是严重产后出血风险更高(2.4%对1.1%;调整后比值比2.37 [1.29 - 4.36]),MLBCs中有五分之二的情况部分可归因于预防性缩宫素使用不足。计划在MLBCs分娩的女性剖宫产和阴道助产分娩显著减少。

结论

在法国,无论计划分娩环境如何,3%至4%的低风险女性经历了严重的母婴不良结局。在分娩方式方面,结果对MLBCs有利,但在严重产后出血方面并非如此,这可以通过修订预防性使用缩宫素的做法部分解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eba9/11609991/a80e1cd06ec0/AOGS-103-2465-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Severe adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes according to the planned birth setting being midwife-led birth centers or obstetric-led units.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Dec;103(12):2465-2474. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14971. Epub 2024 Sep 15.

本文引用的文献

4
Birth models of care and intervention rates: The impact of birth centres.
Health Policy. 2020 Dec;124(12):1395-1402. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
5
Severe maternal morbidity and maternal mortality: A need for consensus on concepts and prevention efforts.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;34(4):377-378. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12676. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
6
The development of midwifery unit standards for Europe.
Midwifery. 2020 Jul;86:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102661. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
8
WHO recommendations on uterotonics for postpartum haemorrhage prevention: what works, and which one?
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Apr 11;4(2):e001466. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001466. eCollection 2019.
9
Active versus expectant management for women in the third stage of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 13;2(2):CD007412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007412.pub5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验