Suppr超能文献

牙膏对儿童口腔内 抗菌效果的比较研究。

Antibacterial effects of dentifrices against in children: a comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Yeditepe University, 34730 Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Oral Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390 Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Mar;48(2):72-81. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.035. Epub 2024 Mar 3.

Abstract

Fluoridated dentifrices have antibacterial effects on children's teeth. On the other hand, the side effects encountered with the use of them have led researchers to look for safe alternatives. This study aimed to determine the antibacterial effect of different commercially available fluoride-free dentifrices on () in comparison with different concentrations of fluoridated dentifrices. Study groups comprised of fluoride-free dentifrices, which contain Probiotic (Activated Charcoal Probiotic Dentifrice-Group P), Aloe Vera-Group AV and Salivary Proteins-Group SP. Fluoridated dentifrices containing 1450 ppm fluoride-Control Group 1 and 500 ppm fluoride-Control Group 2 served as control groups. Antibacterial activity was assessed by Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations and agar well diffusion assays on . Biofilm inhibition assay was performed with dentifrices, which had antibacterial activities, and a negative control phosphate-buffered saline (Group PBS) on sterile hydroxyapatite discs against . Statistical evaluation was performed. Only group AV showed an antibacterial effect on , while control groups showed a similar antibacterial effect. The mean number of viable bacteria present in biofilm in Control Group 1 and 2 and Group AV were statistically significantly lower than that in Group PBS, but there were no statistically significant differences between Control Groups and Group AV. Antibacterial activity of commercial dentifrices against may be exerted by antibacterial components other than fluoride. Aloe vera-containing toothpaste showed an antibacterial effect on , although not as much as the fluoride-containing toothpastes in the control groups. However, further and long-term studies are required.

摘要

含氟牙膏对儿童牙齿具有抗菌作用。另一方面,使用含氟牙膏时出现的副作用促使研究人员寻找更安全的替代品。本研究旨在比较不同市售无氟牙膏与不同浓度含氟牙膏,确定不同市售无氟牙膏对 的抗菌作用。研究组由不含氟的牙膏组成,分别含有益生菌(活性碳益生菌牙膏-组 P)、芦荟-组 AV 和唾液蛋白-组 SP。含 1450ppm 氟的含氟牙膏-对照组 1 和含 500ppm 氟的含氟牙膏-对照组 2 作为对照组。通过最低抑菌浓度和琼脂孔扩散试验评估对 的抗菌活性。使用具有抗菌活性的牙膏和阴性对照磷酸盐缓冲盐水(组 PBS)对无菌羟磷灰石盘上的 进行生物膜抑制试验。进行了统计学评估。只有组 AV 对 显示出抗菌作用,而对照组则显示出相似的抗菌作用。对照组 1 和 2 以及组 AV 中生物膜中存活细菌的平均数量明显低于组 PBS,但对照组和组 AV 之间没有统计学差异。商业牙膏对 的抗菌活性可能是由除氟以外的抗菌成分发挥的。含芦荟的牙膏对 显示出抗菌作用,尽管不如对照组中的含氟牙膏明显。然而,还需要进一步的 和长期研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验