Eisenberg Marla E, Gower Amy L, Del Río-González Ana María, Rider G Nic, Bowleg Lisa, Russell Stephen T
Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota. 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA.
Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire AVE NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Ann LGBTQ Public Popul Health. 2024 Mar;5(1):67-79. doi: 10.1891/lgbtq-2022-0027.
Interpersonal supports are protective against multiple negative health outcomes for youth such as emotional distress and substance use. However, finding interpersonal support may be difficult for youth exposed to intersecting racism, heterosexism, and cisgenderism, who may feel they are "outsiders within" their multiple communities. This study explores disparities in interpersonal supports for youth at different sociodemographic intersections. The 2019 Minnesota Student Survey includes data from 80,456 high school students, including measures of four interpersonal supports: feeling cared about by parents, other adult relatives, friends, and community adults. Exhaustive Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detection analysis was used to examine all interactions among four social identities/positions (racialized/ethnic identity, sexual identity, gender identity, sex assigned at birth) to identify groups who report different rates of caring from each source (Bonferroni adjusted p<.05). In the overall sample, 69.24% perceived the highest level of caring ("very much") from parents, 50.09% from other adult relatives, 39.94% from friends, and 15.03% from community adults. Models identified considerable differences in each source of support. For example, more than 72% of straight, cisgender youth reported their parents cared about them very much, but youth who identified as LGBQ and TGD or gender-questioning were much less likely to report high parent caring (less than 36%) across multiple racialized/ethnic identities and regardless of sex assigned at birth. Findings highlight the importance of better understanding the ways interpersonal support might differ across groups, and underscore a need for intersectionality-tailored interventions to develop protective interpersonal supports for LGBTQ+ youth, rather than one-size-fits-all approaches.
人际支持有助于预防青少年出现多种负面健康结果,如情绪困扰和药物使用。然而,对于那些面临交叉性种族主义、异性恋至上主义和性别规范主义的青少年来说,找到人际支持可能会很困难,他们可能会觉得自己在多个社区中都是“局外人”。本研究探讨了不同社会人口交叉点上青少年人际支持的差异。2019年明尼苏达学生调查涵盖了80456名高中生的数据,包括四种人际支持的测量指标:感觉被父母、其他成年亲属、朋友和社区成年人关心。使用穷尽式卡方自动交互检测分析来检验四种社会身份/地位(种族化/族裔身份、性取向身份、性别身份、出生时被指定的性别)之间的所有相互作用,以确定报告来自各来源不同关心程度的群体(邦费罗尼校正p<0.05)。在总体样本中,69.24%的人认为从父母那里得到的关心程度最高(“非常关心”),50.09%来自其他成年亲属,39.94%来自朋友,15.03%来自社区成年人。模型显示每种支持来源都存在显著差异。例如,超过72%的异性恋、顺性别青少年表示他们的父母非常关心他们,但无论出生时被指定的性别如何,在多个种族化/族裔身份中,认同为LGBQ和TGD或性别存疑的青少年报告得到父母高度关心的可能性要低得多(不到36%)。研究结果凸显了更好地理解人际支持在不同群体中可能存在差异的方式的重要性,并强调需要采取针对交叉性的干预措施,为 LGBTQ+ 青少年建立保护性的人际支持,而不是一刀切的方法。