Suppr超能文献

胸肌间沟和胸小肌平面阻滞与局部浸润麻醉用于部分乳房切除术的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。

Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Block vs. Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Partial Mastectomy: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Central Hospital Karlstad, Karlstad, Sweden.

Department of Anesthesia, Spital Grabs, Grabs, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2024 Mar 20;2024:9989997. doi: 10.1155/2024/9989997. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing breast surgery are at risk of severe postoperative pain. Several opioid-sparing strategies exist to alleviate this condition. Regional anesthesia has long been a part of perioperative pain management for these patients.

AIM

This randomized study examined the benefits of interpectoral and pectoserratus plane block (IPP/PSP), also known as pectoralis nerve plain block, compared with advanced local anesthetic infiltration.

METHODS

We analyzed 57 patients undergoing partial mastectomy with sentinel node dissection. They received either an ultrasound-guided IPP/PSP block performed preoperatively by an anesthetist or local anesthetic infiltration performed by the surgeon before and during the surgery.

RESULTS

Pain measured with the numerical rating scale (NRS) indicated no statistically significant difference between the groups (IPP/PSP 1.67 vs. infiltration 1.97; value 0.578). Intraoperative use of fentanyl was significantly lower in the IPP/PSP group (0.18 mg vs 0.21 mg; value 0.041). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of stay in the PACU (166 min vs 175 min; value 0.51). There were no differences in reported postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) between the groups. The difference in postoperative use of oxycodone in the PACU ( value 0.7) and the use of oxycodone within 24 hours postoperatively ( value 0.87) was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed decreased intraoperative opioid use in the IPP/PSP group and no difference in postoperative pain scores up to 24 hours. Both groups reported low postoperative pain scores. This trial is registered with NCT04824599.

摘要

背景

接受乳房手术的患者存在严重术后疼痛的风险。有几种减少阿片类药物使用的策略可以缓解这种情况。区域麻醉长期以来一直是这些患者围手术期疼痛管理的一部分。

目的

这项随机研究检查了肋间和胸小肌平面阻滞(IPP/PSP)(也称为胸神经平面阻滞)与先进的局部麻醉浸润相比的益处。

方法

我们分析了 57 例接受前哨淋巴结活检的部分乳房切除术患者。他们接受了麻醉师术前进行的超声引导下 IPP/PSP 阻滞,或外科医生在手术前和手术期间进行的局部麻醉浸润。

结果

数字评分量表(NRS)测量的疼痛无统计学显著差异(IPP/PSP 1.67 与浸润 1.97; 值 0.578)。IPP/PSP 组术中芬太尼的使用量明显低于浸润组(0.18mg 与 0.21mg; 值 0.041)。PACU 停留时间无统计学显著差异(166min 与 175min; 值 0.51)。两组术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率无差异。PACU 中术后使用羟考酮( 值 0.7)和术后 24 小时内使用羟考酮( 值 0.87)的差异无统计学意义。

结论

我们的研究表明 IPP/PSP 组术中阿片类药物使用减少,术后 24 小时内疼痛评分无差异。两组报告的术后疼痛评分均较低。该试验在 NCT04824599 注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99fa/10977337/b5db9fdf96f4/PRM2024-9989997.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验