Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Anaesthesia and Peri-operative Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1372-1385. doi: 10.1111/anae.15000. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
Serratus anterior plane and pectoral nerves blocks are recently described alternatives to established regional anaesthesia techniques in cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and trauma. We performed a systematic review to establish the current state of evidence for the analgesic role of these fascial plane blocks in these clinical settings. We identified relevant studies by searching multiple databases and trial registries from inception to June 2019. Study heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis and studies were instead qualitatively summarised and stratified by type of surgery and comparator. We identified 51 studies: nine randomised control trials; 13 cohort studies; 19 case series; and 10 case reports. The majority of randomised controlled trials studied the serratus anterior plane block in thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, with only two investigating pectoral nerves blocks. The evidence in thoracic trauma comprised only case series and reports. Results indicate that single-injection serratus anterior plane and the pectoral nerves blocks reduce pain scores and opioid consumption compared with systemic analgesia alone in cardiothoracic surgery, cardiac-related interventional procedures and chest trauma for approximately 6-12 h. The duration of action appears longer than intercostal nerve blocks but may be shorter than thoracic paravertebral blockade. Block duration may be prolonged by a continuous catheter technique with potentially similar results to thoracic epidural analgesia. There were no reported complications and the risk of haemodynamic instability appears to be low. The current evidence, though limited, supports the efficacy and safety of serratus anterior plane and the pectoral nerves blocks as analgesic options in cardiothoracic surgery.
前锯肌平面和胸神经阻滞是最近描述的替代心脏手术、胸外科和创伤中既定区域麻醉技术的方法。我们进行了系统评价,以确定这些筋膜平面阻滞在这些临床环境中的镇痛作用的当前证据状态。我们通过搜索多个数据库和试验登记处,从成立到 2019 年 6 月,确定了相关研究。由于研究异质性,无法进行荟萃分析,因此研究按手术类型和比较剂进行定性总结和分层。我们确定了 51 项研究:9 项随机对照试验;13 项队列研究;19 项病例系列研究;和 10 项病例报告。大多数随机对照试验研究了开胸术或电视辅助胸腔镜手术中的前锯肌平面阻滞,只有两项研究了胸神经阻滞。胸部创伤的证据仅包括病例系列和报告。结果表明,与单纯全身镇痛相比,单次注射前锯肌平面和胸神经阻滞可减少心胸外科、心脏相关介入性手术和胸部创伤中的疼痛评分和阿片类药物的消耗,约 6-12 小时。作用持续时间似乎长于肋间神经阻滞,但可能短于胸椎旁神经阻滞。连续导管技术可延长阻滞持续时间,可能与胸椎硬膜外镇痛具有相似的效果。没有报告并发症,且血流动力学不稳定的风险似乎较低。尽管目前的证据有限,但支持前锯肌平面和胸神经阻滞作为心胸外科手术中镇痛选择的有效性和安全性。