Cesur Emre, Tuncer Koray, Sevgi Duygu, Balaban Barkın Cem, Arslan Can
Private Practice, Ankara, Turkey.
Antalya Bilim University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Antalya, Turkey.
Turk J Orthod. 2024 Mar 28;37(1):44-49. doi: 10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.127.
This study aimed to evaluate the quality, reliability, and content usefulness of videos created by orthodontists on clear orthodontic aligners.
Videos were screened using YouTube by conducting a search for "Invisalign". After a preliminary evaluation of the first 250 results, 61 videos that met the selection criteria were scored and their length, days since upload, and numbers of views, likes, dislikes, and comments were recorded. These data were used to calculate the interaction index and viewing rate. Video reliability was assessed using a five-item modified DISCERN index, and video quality was assessed using the Video Information and Quality Index. A 10-item content usefulness index was created to determine the usefulness of the video content. Descriptive statistics of the parameters were calculated, and correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate the relationships between the parameters.
The mean reliability score was 2.75±1.02 (out of 5), and the total quality score was 11.80±3.38 (out of 20). The total content usefulness index was quite low, with a mean score of 2.52±2.14 (out of 10). Interaction index and viewing rate were positively correlated with reliability score (r=0.463, p<0.01; r=0.295, p<0.05) and total quality score (r=0.365, p<0.01; r=0.295, p<0.01, respectively). The reliability score was positively correlated with the total quality score (r=0.842, p<0.01) and total content usefulness index (r=0.346, p<0.01).
Videos about orthodontic aligner treatment have average reliability and quality but largely insufficient content.
本研究旨在评估正畸医生制作的关于透明正畸矫治器的视频的质量、可靠性和内容实用性。
通过在YouTube上搜索“Invisalign”来筛选视频。在对前250个结果进行初步评估后,对符合选择标准的61个视频进行评分,并记录其时长、上传天数以及观看次数、点赞数、点踩数和评论数。这些数据用于计算互动指数和观看率。使用五项修改后的DISCERN指数评估视频可靠性,使用视频信息与质量指数评估视频质量。创建一个十项内容实用性指数来确定视频内容的实用性。计算参数的描述性统计量,并计算相关系数以评估参数之间的关系。
平均可靠性得分为2.75±1.02(满分5分),总质量得分为11.80±3.38(满分20分)。总内容实用性指数相当低,平均得分为2.52±2.14(满分10分)。互动指数和观看率与可靠性得分呈正相关(r = 0.463,p < 0.01;r = 0.295,p < 0.05)和总质量得分呈正相关(分别为r = 0.365,p < 0.01;r = 0.295,p < 0.01)。可靠性得分与总质量得分呈正相关(r = 0.842,p < 0.01)和总内容实用性指数呈正相关(r = 0.346,p < 0.01)。
关于正畸矫治器治疗的视频可靠性和质量一般,但内容大多不足。