YouTube作为根管治疗中器械分离的信息来源。
YouTube as an information source for instrument separation in root canal treatment.
作者信息
Özbay Yağız, Çırakoğlu Neslihan Yılmaz
机构信息
Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.
出版信息
Restor Dent Endod. 2021 Jan 12;46(1):e8. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e8. eCollection 2021 Feb.
OBJECTIVES
The reliability and educational quality of videos on YouTube for patients seeking information regarding instrument separation in root canal treatment were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
YouTube was searched for videos on instrument separation in root canal treatment. Video content was scored based on reliability in terms of 3 categories (etiology, procedure, and prognosis) and based on video flow, quality, and educational usefulness using the Global Quality Score (GQS). Descriptive statistics were obtained and the data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test.
RESULTS
The highest mean completeness scores were obtained for videos published by dentists or specialists (1.48 ± 1.06). There was no statistically significant difference among sources of upload in terms of content completeness. The highest mean GQS was found for videos published by dentists or specialists (1.82 ± 0.96), although there was no statistically significant correlation between GQS and the source of upload.
CONCLUSIONS
Videos on YouTube have incomplete and low-quality content for patients who are concerned about instrument separation during endodontic treatment, or who experience this complication during endodontic treatment.
目的
评估YouTube上为寻求根管治疗中器械分离相关信息的患者提供的视频的可靠性和教育质量。
材料与方法
在YouTube上搜索根管治疗中器械分离的视频。根据病因、操作和预后3个类别对视频内容的可靠性进行评分，并使用全球质量评分（GQS）根据视频流程、质量和教育实用性进行评分。获得描述性统计数据，并使用方差分析和Kruskal-Wallis检验对数据进行分析。
结果
由牙医或专家发布的视频获得了最高的平均完整性评分（1.48±1.06）。在内容完整性方面，上传来源之间没有统计学上的显著差异。由牙医或专家发布的视频的平均GQS最高（1.82±0.96），尽管GQS与上传来源之间没有统计学上的显著相关性。
结论
对于在牙髓治疗期间担心器械分离或经历这种并发症的患者而言，YouTube上的视频内容不完整且质量较低。
Zotero 插件